The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Early Structural Evolution and Anisotropy of the Oceanic Upper Mantle
Open accessAbstract
The dispersion of Love and Rayleigh waves in the period range 17–167 s is used to detect the change in the structure of the upper mantle as the age of the sea-floor increases away from the mid-ocean ridge. Using the single station method, the group and phase velocities of Rayleigh waves were measured for 78 paths in the east Pacific. In order to describe the observed Rayleigh wave dispersion, both a systematic increase in velocities with the age of the sea-floor and anisotropy of propagation are required. The maximum change in velocity with age is about 5 per cent, with the contrast between age zones decreasing with increasing period. The greatest change occurs in the first few million years, due to the rapid cooling and solidification of the upper part of the lithosphere. In the 0–5 My age zone, the average thickness of the lithosphere can be no greater than 30 km, including the water and crustal layers. Within 10 My after formation, the lithosphere reaches a thickness of about 60 km. As the mantle continues to cool, the shear velocity within the lithosphere increases. Within the area of this study, no change occurs in the upper mantle deeper than about 80 km. Rayleigh waves travel fastest in the direction of spreading. The degree of anisotropy in Rayleigh wave propagation is frequency-dependent, reaching a maximum of 2·0±0·2 per cent at a period of about 70 s. Several models are constructed which can reproduce this frequency-dependent anisotropy. The regional phase velocities of the fundamental and first higher Love modes have been simultaneously measured using a new technique. The Love wave data is inconsistent with the Rayleigh wave data unless SH velocity is higher than SV velocity within the uppermost 125 km of the mantle. Anisotropy deeper than 250 km is suggested, but not required, by the data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some remarks on heat flow and gravity anomalies
McKenzie, D. P. (1967) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz072i024p06261 · Cited by 751
Cited by
Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: What have we learned from shear wave splitting?
Savage, M. K. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/98rg02075 · Cited by 1,312
Wenk, H.-R. (2002) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/gsrmg.51.1.291 · Cited by 931
Formation of anisotropy in upper mantle peridotites: A review
Nicolas, A., & Christensen, N. I. (1987) · Geodynamics Series · doi:10.1029/gd016p0111 · Cited by 710
The anisotropic structure of the upper mantle in the Pacific
Nishimura, C. E., & Forsyth, D. W. (1989) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1989.tb04446.x · Cited by 409
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Forsyth, D. W.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1975-10-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-162
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2135671675
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Early Structural Evolution and Anisotropy of the Oceanic Upper Mantle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1975.tb00630.x
- The paper
- Forsyth, D. W. (1975). The Early Structural Evolution and Anisotropy of the Oceanic Upper Mantle. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1975.tb00630.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.