Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Whole plant respiration and photosynthesis of wheat under increased CO2 concentration and temperature: long‐term vs. short‐term distinctions for modelling

GIFFORD, ROGER M.·1995·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Short‐ and long‐term effects of elevated CO 2 concentration and temperature on whole plant respiratory relationships are examined for wheat grown at four constant temperatures and at two CO 2 concentrations. Whole plant CO 2 exchange was measured on a 24 h basis and measurement conditions varied both to observe short‐term effects and to determine the growth respiration coefficient (r g), dry weight maintenance coefficient (r m), basal (i.e. dark acclimated) respiration coefficient (r g), and 24 h respiration:photosynthesis ratio (R:P). There was no response of r g to short‐term variation in CO2 concentration. For plants with adequate N supply, r g was unaffected by the growth‐CO 2 despite a 10% reduction in the plant's N concentration (%N). However, r m was decreased 13%, and r b was decreased 20% by growth in elevated CO 2 concentration relative to ambient. Nevertheless, R:P was not affected by growth in elevated CO 2. Whole plant respiration responded to short‐term variation of ± 5 °C around the growth temperature with low sensitivity (Q 10= 1.8 at 15 °C, 1.3 at 30 °C). The shape of the response of whole plant respiration to growth temperature was different from that of the short term response, being a slanted S‐shape declining between 25 and 30 °C. While r m, increased, r g decreased when growth temperature increased between 15 and 20 °C. Above 20 °C r m became temperature insensitive while r g increased with growth temperature. Despite these complex component responses, R:P increased only from 0.40 to 0.43 between 15° and 30 °C growth temperatures. Giving the plants a step increase in temperature caused a transient increase in R:P which recovered to the pre‐transient value in 3 days. It is concluded that use of a constant R:P with respect to average temperature and CO 2 concentration may be a more simple and accurate way to model the responses of wheat crop respiration to ‘climate change’ than the more complex and mechanistically dubious functional analysis into growth and maintenance components.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00037.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
GIFFORD, R. M.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-12
Volume
1
Issue
6
Pages
385-396
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2112769762
Cited by
260
References
0
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whole plant respiration and photosynthesis of wheat under increased CO2 concentration and temperature: long‐term vs. short‐term distinctions for modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00037.x
The paper
GIFFORD, R. M. (1995). Whole plant respiration and photosynthesis of wheat under increased CO2 concentration and temperature: long‐term vs. short‐term distinctions for modelling. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00037.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.