Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Annual cycles of water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes in and above a boreal aspen forest

BLACK, T. A., DEN HARTOG, G., NEUMANN, H. H., BLANKEN, P.D., YANG, P.C., RUSSELL, C., NESIC, Z., LEE, X., CHEN, S. G., STAEBLER, R., NOVAK, M. D.·1996·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Water vapour and CO 2 fluxes were measured using the eddy correlation method above and below the overstorey of a 21‐m tall aspen stand in the boreal forest of central Saskatchewan as part of the Boreal Ecosystem‐Atmosphere Study (BOREAS). Measurements were made at the 39.5‐m and 4‐m heights using 3‐dimensional sonic anemometers (Kaijo‐Denki and Solent, respectively) and closed‐path gas analysers (LI‐COR 6262) with 6‐m and 4.7‐m long heated sampling tubing, respectively. Continuous measurements were made from early October to mid‐November 1993 and from early February to late‐September 1994. Soil CO 2 flux (respiration) was measured using a LI‐COR 6000‐09 soil chamber and soil evaporation was measured using Iysimetry. The leaf area index of the aspen and hazelnut understorey reached 1.8 and 3.3, respectively. The maximum daily evapotranspiration (E) rate was 5–6 mm d−1. Following leaf‐out the hazelnut and soil accounted for 22% of the forest E. The estimated total E was 403 mm for 1994. About 88% of the precipitation in 1994 was lost as evapotranspiration. During the growing season, the magnitude of half‐hourly eddy fluxes of CO 2 from the atmosphere into the forest reached 1.2 mg CO 2 m−2 s−1 (33 μmol C m−2 s−1) during the daytime. Downward eddy fluxes at the 4‐m height were observed when the hazelnut was growing rapidly in June and July. Under well‐ventilated night‐time conditions, the eddy fluxes of CO 2 above the aspen and hazelnut, corrected for canopy storage, increased exponentially with soil temperature at the 2‐cm depth. Estimates of daytime respiration rates using these relationships agreed well with soil chamber measurements. During the 1994 growing season, the cumulative net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was ‐3.5 t C ha−1 y−1 (a net gain by the system). For 1994, cumulative NEE, ecosystem respiration (R) and gross ecosystem photosynthesis (GEP = R ‐ NEE) were estimated to be ‐1.3, 8.9 and 10.2 t C ha−1 y−1 respectively. Gross photosynthesis of the hazelnut was 32% of GEP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00074.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
BLACK, T. A., DEN HARTOG, G., NEUMANN, H. H., BLANKEN, P. D., YANG, P. C., RUSSELL, C., NESIC, Z., LEE, X., CHEN, S. G., STAEBLER, R., & NOVAK, M. D.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-06
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
219-229
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2164559244
Cited by
429
References
12
FWCI
37.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annual cycles of water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes in and above a boreal aspen forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00074.x
The paper
BLACK, T. A., DEN HARTOG, G., NEUMANN, H. H., BLANKEN, P. D., YANG, P. C., RUSSELL, C., NESIC, Z., LEE, X., CHEN, S. G., STAEBLER, R., & NOVAK, M. D. (1996). Annual cycles of water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes in and above a boreal aspen forest. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00074.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.