The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitrogen cycling in the soil–plant system along a precipitation gradient in the Kalahari sands
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) cycling was analyzed in the Kalahari region of southern Africa, where a strong precipitation gradient (from 978 to 230 mm mean annual precipitation) is the main variable affecting vegetation. The region is underlain by a homogeneous soil substrate, the Kalahari sands, and provides the opportunity to analyze climate effects on nutrient cycling. Soil and plant N pools, 15 N natural abundance (δ15 N), and soil NO emissions were measured to indicate patterns of N cycling along a precipitation gradient. The importance of biogenic N 2 fixation associated with vascular plants was estimated with foliar δ15 N and the basal area of leguminous plants. Soil and plant N was more 15 N enriched in arid than in humid areas, and the relation was steeper in samples collected during wet than during dry years. This indicates a strong effect of annual precipitation variability on N cycling. Soil organic carbon and C/N decreased with aridity, and soil N was influenced by plant functional types. Biogenic N 2 fixation associated with vascular plants was more important in humid areas. Nitrogen fixation associated with trees and shrubs was almost absent in arid areas, even though Mimosoideae species dominate. Soil NO emissions increased with temperature and moisture and were therefore estimated to be lower in drier areas. The isotopic pattern observed in the Kalahari (15 N enrichment with aridity) agrees with the lower soil organic matter, soil C/N, and N 2 fixation found in arid areas. However, the estimated NO emissions would cause an opposite pattern in δ15 N, suggesting that other processes, such as internal recycling and ammonia volatilization, may also affect isotopic signatures. This study indicates that spatial, and mainly temporal, variability of precipitation play a key role on N cycling and isotopic signatures in the soil–plant system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brilli, L., Bechini, L., Bindi, M., Carozzi, M., Cavalli, D., Conant, R., Dorich, C. D., Doro, L., Ehrhardt, F., Farina, R., et al. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.208 · Cited by 244
Scanlon, T. M., Caylor, K. K., Manfreda, S., Levin, S. A., & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2005) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.10.014 · Cited by 126
Coutu, A. N., Whitelaw, G., le Roux, P., & Sealy, J. (2016) · African Archaeological Review · doi:10.1007/s10437-016-9232-0 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Aranibar, J. N., Otter, L., Macko, S. A., Feral, C. J. W., Epstein, H. E., Dowty, P. R., Eckardt, F., Shugart, H. H., & Swap, R. J.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359-373
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2097762260
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen cycling in the soil–plant system along a precipitation gradient in the Kalahari sands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00698.x
- The paper
- Aranibar, J. N., Otter, L., Macko, S. A., Feral, C. J. W., Epstein, H. E., Dowty, P. R., Eckardt, F., Shugart, H. H., & Swap, R. J. (2004). Nitrogen cycling in the soil–plant system along a precipitation gradient in the Kalahari sands. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00698.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.