The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How long before a change in soil organic carbon can be detected?
Abstract
When planning sampling in an experiment where soil organic carbon (SOC) content is expected to change, it is necessary to know how many samples will need to be taken to demonstrate a change in SOC and after how long this change will be detectable. Much has been published on the number of samples required to demonstrate the minimum detectable difference in SOC, but less on how long it takes for this change to be detectable. In this paper, a model of SOC dynamics is used to estimate the minimum time taken for a change in total SOC content to become measurable under different carbon inputs, land uses and soil types. For free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE), and other experiments in which SOC is expected to increase, relationships between the percentage change in C inputs and the time taken to measure a change in SOC are presented, for two levels of sampling intensity corresponding to the maximum that is practically possible in most experiments (∼100 samples) and that used regularly in field experiments (10–20 samples). In FACE experiments, where C inputs increase by a maximum of about 20–25%, SOC change could be detected with 90% confidence after about 6–10 years if a sampling regime allowing 3% change in background SOC level (probably requiring a very large number of samples) were used, but could not be detected at all if a sampling regime were used that allowed only a 15% change in background SOC to be detected. If increases in C inputs are much below 15%, it might not be possible to detect a change in soil C without an enormous number of samples. Relationships between the change in C inputs and the time taken to measure a change in SOC are robust over a range of soil types and land uses. The results demonstrate how models of SOC dynamics can be used to complement statistical power analyses for planning when, and how intensively, to sample soils during experiments. An advantage of the modelling approach demonstrated here is that estimates of the minimum time taken for a change in soil carbon to become detectable can be made, even before any detailed soil samples are taken, simply from estimates of the likely increase in carbon inputs to the soil (via expected changes in net primary production).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil carbon pools and world life zones
Post, W. M., Emanuel, W. R., Zinke, P. J., & Stangenberger, A. G. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/298156a0 · Cited by 2,255
Survival in small intestinal adenocarcinoma
Zar, N., Holmberg, L., Wilander, E., & Rastad, J. (1996) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00244-4 · Cited by 1,243
Smith, P., Smith, J. U., Powlson, D. S., McGill, W. B., Arah, J. R. M., Chertov, O. G., Coleman, K., Franko, U., Frolking, S., Jenkinson, D. S., et al. (1997) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(97)00087-6 · Cited by 1,150
Self-citationModel estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming
Jenkinson, D. S., Adams, D. E., & Wild, A. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/351304a0 · Cited by 1,116
Responses of Agricultural Crops to Free-Air CO2 Enrichment
Kimball, B. A., Kobayashi, K., & Bindi, M. (2002) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(02)77017-x · Cited by 977
The turnover of organic carbon and nitrogen in soil
Jenkinson, D. S. (1990) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0177 · Cited by 960
RothC-26.3 - A Model for the turnover of carbon in soil
Coleman, K., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1996) · Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61094-3_17 · Cited by 774
Natural 13C abundance as a tracer for studies of soil organic matter dynamics
Balesdent, J., Mariotti, A., & Guillet, B. (1987) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90120-9 · Cited by 724
Measuring and Understanding Carbon Storage in Afforested Soils by Physical Fractionation
Six, J., Callewaert, P., Lenders, S., De Gryze, S., Morris, S. J., Gregorich, E. G., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1981 · Cited by 680
Schlesinger, W. H., & Lichter, J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35078060 · Cited by 523
Cited by
Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta-analysis
LAGANIÈRE, J., ANGERS, D. A., & PARÉ, D. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01930.x · Cited by 956
Hyvönen, R., Ågren, G. I., Linder, S., Persson, T., Cotrufo, M. F., Ekblad, A., Freeman, M., Grelle, A., Janssens, I. A., Jarvis, P. G., et al. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01967.x · Cited by 688
Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives
Piao, S., Wang, X., Wang, K., Li, X., Bastos, A., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Friedlingstein, P., & Sitch, S. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14884 · Cited by 486
Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus
CLIFTON‐BROWN, J. C., BREUER, J., & JONES, M. B. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01438.x · Cited by 393
Poulton, P., Johnston, J., Macdonald, A., White, R., & Powlson, D. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14066 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, P.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-25
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1878-1883
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2120902055
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How long before a change in soil organic carbon can be detected? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00854.x
- The paper
- Smith, P. (2004). How long before a change in soil organic carbon can be detected? Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00854.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.