Cited by 123Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil erosion and sediment transport

The conversion of the corn/soybean ecosystem to no‐till agriculture may result in a carbon sink

Bernacchi, Carl J., Hollinger, Steven E., Meyers, Tilden·2005·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Mitigating or slowing an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO 2]) has been the focus of international efforts, most apparent with the development of the Kyoto Protocol. Sequestration of carbon (C) in agricultural soils is being advocated as a method to assist in meeting the demands of an international C credit system. The conversion of conventionally tilled agricultural lands to no till is widely accepted as having a large‐scale sequestration potential. In this study, C flux measurements over a no‐till corn/soybean agricultural ecosystem over 6 years were coupled with estimates of C release associated with agricultural practices to assess the net biome productivity (NBP) of this no‐till ecosystem. Estimates of NBP were also calculated for the conventionally tilled corn/soybean ecosystem assuming net ecosystem exchange is C neutral. These measurements were scaled to the US as a whole to determine the sequestration potential of corn/soybean ecosystems, under current practices where 10% of agricultural land devoted to this ecosystem is no‐tilled and under a hypothetical scenario where 100% of the land is not tilled. The estimates of this analysis show that current corn/soybean agriculture in the US releases ∼7.2 Tg C annually, with no‐till sequestering ∼2.2 Tg and conventional‐till releasing ∼9.4 Tg. The complete conversion of land area to no till might result in 21.7 Tg C sequestered annually, representing a net C flux difference of ∼29 Tg C. These results demonstrate that large‐scale conversion to no‐till practices, at least for the corn/soybean ecosystem, could potentially offset ca. 2% of annual US carbon emissions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01050.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced tillage results in soil C sequestration.

    “Conversely, reduced tillage results in soil C sequestration (e.g., West & Post, 2002;Bernacchi et al., 2005;Grandy & Robertson, 2007), and SOC accumulation under perennial grasses grown on former cropland may be partially attributable to the cessation of tillage.”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Bernacchi et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernacchi, C. J., Hollinger, S. E., & Meyers, T.
Affiliations
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Bernacchi, Carl J.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-13
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
1867-1872
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W4230997883
Cited by
123
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
no-tillage, carbon sequestration, net biome production, carbon flux measurement, conventional tillage, agricultural carbon emissions, carbon credits, soil carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review