Cited by 108Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Predicting the influence of wolf‐provided carrion on scavenger community dynamics under climate change scenarios

WILMERS, CHRISTOPHER C., POST, ERIC·2006·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Climate change poses an immediate threat to the persistence and distribution of many species, yet our ability to forecast changes in species composition is hindered by poor understanding of the extent to which higher trophic‐level interactions may buffer or exacerbate the adverse effects of warming. We incorporated species‐specific consumption data from 240 wolf‐killed elk carcasses from Yellowstone National Park into stochastic simulation models to link trends in the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) to food procurement by a guild of scavengers as a function of gray wolf reintroduction. We find that a shift in ENSO towards the El Niño (warming) phase of the cycle coincident with increasing global temperatures reduces carrion for scavengers, particularly those with strong seasonal patterns in resource use such as grizzly bears. Wolves alleviate these warming‐induced food shortages by rendering control over this crucial resource to biotic rather than abiotic factors. Ecosystems with intact top predators are likely to exhibit stronger biotic regulation and should be more resistant to climate change than ecosystems lacking them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01094.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The return of wolves to YNP may help buffer populations of prey species, particularly elk, and scavengers from the effects of impending climate change.

    “The return of wolves to YNP may help buffer populations of prey species, particularly elk, and scavengers from the effects of impending climate change (Wilmers & Getz, 2005; Wilmers & Post, 2006; Wilmers, Post, & Hastings, 2007).”

    From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Wilmers & Post, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILMERS, C. C., & POST, E.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
WILMERS, CHRISTOPHER C.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-27
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
403-409
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2135168513
Cited by
108
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
wolf reintroduction, gray wolf, carrion, scavenger guilds, climate change, ENSO, grizzly bear, top predators, trophic interactions, food procurement, stochastic simulation model, Yellowstone National Park, ecosystem resilience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review