The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems – recent progress and challenges
Open accessAbstract
Net ecosystem production is the residual of two much larger fluxes: photosynthesis and respiration. While photosynthesis is a single process with a well‐established theoretical underpinning, respiration integrates the variety of plant and microbial processes by which CO 2 returns from ecosystems to the atmosphere. Limits to current capacity for predicting ecosystem respiration fluxes across biomes or years result from the mismatch between what is usually measured – bulk CO 2 fluxes – and what process‐based models can predict – fluxes of CO 2 from plant (autotrophic) or microbial (heterotrophic) respiration. Papers in this Thematic Issue and in the recent literature, document advances in methods for separating respiration into autotrophic and heterotrophic components using three approaches: (1) continuous measurements of CO 2 fluxes and assimilation of these data into process‐based models; (2) application of isotope measurements, particularly radiocarbon; and (3) manipulation experiments. They highlight the role of allocation of C fixed by plants to respiration, storage, growth or transfer to other organisms as a control of seasonal and interannual variability in soil respiration and the oxidation state of C in the terrestrial biosphere. A second theme is the potential for comparing C isotope signatures in organic matter, CO 2 evolved in incubations and microbial biomarkers to elucidate the pathways (respiration, recycling, or transformation) of C during decomposition. Together, these factors determine the continuum of timescales over which C is returned to the atmosphere by respiration and enable testing of theories of plant and microbial respiration that go beyond empirical models and allow predictions of future respiration responses to future change in climate, pollution and land use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
Cooper, R. N., Houghton, J. T., McCarthy, J. J., & Metz, B. (2002) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20033020 · Cited by 12,889
Analysis of Factors Controlling Soil Organic Matter Levels in Great Plains Grasslands
Parton, W. J., Schimel, D. S., Cole, C. V., & Ojima, D. S. (1987) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050015x · Cited by 3,759
The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate
RAICH, J. W., & SCHLESINGER, W. H. (1992) · Tellus B · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.1992.t01-1-00001.x · Cited by 3,486
Hanson, P. J., Edwards, N. T., Garten, C. T., & Andrews, J. A. (2000) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006244819642 · Cited by 2,030
Stable Isotopes in Plant Ecology
Dawson, T. E., Mambelli, S., Plamboeck, A. H., Templer, P. H., & Tu, K. P. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095451 · Cited by 1,947
Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration
Högberg, P., Nordgren, A., Buchmann, N., Taylor, A. F. S., Ekblad, A., Högberg, M. N., Nyberg, G., Ottosson-Löfvenius, M., & Read, D. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35081058 · Cited by 1,868
Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover
Torn, M. S., Trumbore, S. E., Chadwick, O. A., Vitousek, P. M., & Hendricks, D. M. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/38260 · Cited by 1,603
Self-citationTerrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle
SCHIMEL, D. S. (1995) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00008.x · Cited by 1,564
Schimel, J. (2003) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(03)00015-4 · Cited by 1,552
GOULDEN, M. L., MUNGER, J. W., FAN, S., DAUBE, B. C., & WOFSY, S. C. (1996) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00070.x · Cited by 1,409
Cited by
Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record
Bond-Lamberty, B., & Thomson, A. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08930 · Cited by 1,618
Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity
Richardson, A. D., Andy Black, T., Ciais, P., Delbart, N., Friedl, M. A., Gobron, N., Hollinger, D. Y., Kutsch, W. L., Longdoz, B., Luyssaert, S., et al. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0102 · Cited by 936
Liu, S., Bond-Lamberty, B., Hicke, J. A., Vargas, R., Zhao, S., Chen, J., Edburg, S. L., Hu, Y., Liu, J., McGuire, A. D., et al. (2011) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/2010jg001585 · Cited by 466
Seasonal dynamics and age of stemwood nonstructural carbohydrates in temperate forest trees
Richardson, A. D., Carbone, M. S., Keenan, T. F., Czimczik, C. I., Hollinger, D. Y., Murakami, P., Schaberg, P. G., & Xu, X. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12042 · Cited by 419
Harvesting the Biosphere: The Human Impact
Smil, V. (2011) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00450.x · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- TRUMBORE, S.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-153
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2158806627
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 58.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems – recent progress and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01067.x
- The paper
- TRUMBORE, S. (2006). Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems – recent progress and challenges. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01067.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
