The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends and methodological impacts in soil CO2 efflux partitioning: A metaanalytical review
Abstract
Partitioning soil carbon dioxide (CO 2) efflux (RS) into autotrophic (RA; including plant roots and closely associated organisms) and heterotrophic (RH) components has received considerable attention, as differential responses of these components to environmental change have profound implications for the soil and ecosystem C balance. The increasing number of partitioning studies allows a more detailed analysis of experimental constraints than was previously possible. We present results of an exhaustive literature search of partitioning studies and analyse global trends in flux partitioning between biomes and ecosystem types by means of a metaanalysis. Across all data, an overall decline in the RH/RS ratio for increasing annual RS fluxes emerged. For forest ecosystems, boreal coniferous sites showed significantly higher (P<0.05) RH/RS ratios than temperate sites, while both temperate or tropical deciduous forests did not differ in ratios from any of the other forest types. While chronosequence studies report consistent declines in the RH/RS ratio with age, no difference could be detected for different age groups in the global data set. Different methodologies showed generally good agreement if the range of RS under which they had been measured was considered, with the exception of studies estimating R H by means of root mass regressions against RS, which resulted in consistently lower RH/RS estimates out of all methods included. Additionally, the time step over which fluxes were partitioned did not affect RH/RS ratios consistently. To put results into context, we review the most common techniques and point out the likely sources of errors associated with them. In order to improve soil CO 2 efflux partitioning in future experiments, we include methodological recommendations, and also highlight the potential interactions between soil components that may be overlooked as a consequence of the partitioning process itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · cited 2×
“QB is tested against a w2-distribution at n 1 degrees of freedom, where n is the number of groups being compared (Hedges et al., 1999).”
Method
Cited by
Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition
Janssens, I. A., Dieleman, W., Luyssaert, S., Subke, J.-A., Reichstein, M., Ceulemans, R., Ciais, P., Dolman, A. J., Grace, J., Matteucci, G., et al. (2010) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo844 · Cited by 1,594
Self-citation(2010) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/472 · Cited by 851
KUZYAKOV, Y., & GAVRICHKOVA, O. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02179.x · Cited by 687
Granier, A., Reichstein, M., Bréda, N., Janssens, I. A., Falge, E., Ciais, P., Grünwald, T., Aubinet, M., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., et al. (2007) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.004 · Cited by 623
Carbon isotopes in terrestrial ecosystem pools and CO2 fluxes
Bowling, D. R., Pataki, D. E., & Randerson, J. T. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02342.x · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- SUBKE, J., INGLIMA, I., & FRANCESCA COTRUFO, M.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-14
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 921-943
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2142737108
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends and methodological impacts in soil CO2 efflux partitioning: A metaanalytical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01117.x
- The paper
- SUBKE, J., INGLIMA, I., & FRANCESCA COTRUFO, M. (2006). Trends and methodological impacts in soil CO2 efflux partitioning: A metaanalytical review. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01117.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.