The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon isotopes in terrestrial ecosystem pools and CO2 fluxes
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Stable carbon isotopes are used extensively to examine physiological, ecological, and biogeochemical processes related to ecosystem, regional, and global carbon cycles and provide information at a variety of temporal and spatial scales. Much is known about the processes that regulate the carbon isotopic composition (δ 13 C) of leaf, plant, and ecosystem carbon pools and of photosynthetic and respiratory carbon dioxide (CO 2) fluxes. In this review, systematic patterns and mechanisms underlying variation in δ 13 C of plant and ecosystem carbon pools and fluxes are described. We examine the hypothesis that the δ 13 C of leaf biomass can be used as a reference point for other carbon pools and fluxes, which differ from the leaf in δ 13 C in a systematic fashion. Plant organs are typically enriched in 13 C relative to leaves, and most ecosystem pools and respiratory fluxes are enriched relative to sun leaves of dominant plants, with the notable exception of root respiration. Analysis of the chemical and isotopic composition of leaves and leaf respiration suggests that growth respiration has the potential to contribute substantially to the observed offset between the δ 13 C values of ecosystem respiration and the bulk leaf. We discuss the implications of systematic variations in δ 13 C of ecosystem pools and CO 2 fluxes for studies of carbon cycling within ecosystems, as well as for studies that use the δ 13 C of atmospheric CO 2 to diagnose changes in the terrestrial biosphere over annual to millennial time scales. Contents Summary 1 I. Introduction 2 II. Isotopic composition of plant metabolites and autotrophic respiration 3 III. Isotopic composition of plant and ecosystem carbon pools 8 IV. Isotopic composition of assimilation and respiration fluxes 9 V. Ecosystem to global scale issues – isotopic composition of gross primary production, net primary production, and net ecosystem production 11 VI. Conclusions and suggestions for further research 12 Acknowledgements 13 References 13
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World's Humid Tropical Forests
Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H.-J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T., & Malingreau, J.-P. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070656 · Cited by 1,993 · cited 1×
“In the tropics, a primary contemporary loss pathway is deforestation, with the largest flux originating from the aboveground woody biomass pool (Houghton et al., 2000; Achard et al., 2002; Saatchi et al., 2007).”
BackgroundThe McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later.
Amthor, J. (2000) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1175 · Cited by 822 · cited 2×
“Protein turnover may involve recycling of amino acids in addition to the synthesis of new ones (Amthor, 2000), and the effects of both processes on C isotope fractionation have not been well examined.”
Background
Cited by
Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere
Ellis, E. C. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0331 · Cited by 845
Power, I. M., Wilson, S., Thom, J. M., Dipple, G. M., Gabites, J. E., & Southam, G. (2009) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.01.012 · Cited by 153
Whitman, T., Enders, A., & Lehmann, J. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.02.009 · Cited by 108
Biological enhancement of soil carbonate precipitation: passive removal of atmospheric CO2
Manning, D. A. C. (2008) · Mineralogical Magazine · doi:10.1180/minmag.2008.072.2.639 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowling, D. R., Pataki, D. E., & Randerson, J. T.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-07
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-40
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2158405444
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon isotopes in terrestrial ecosystem pools and CO2 fluxes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02342.x
- The paper
- Bowling, D. R., Pataki, D. E., & Randerson, J. T. (2008). Carbon isotopes in terrestrial ecosystem pools and CO2 fluxes. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02342.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.