Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon isotopes in terrestrial ecosystem pools and CO2 fluxes

Open access
Bowling, David R., Pataki, Diane E., Randerson, James T.·2008·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Stable carbon isotopes are used extensively to examine physiological, ecological, and biogeochemical processes related to ecosystem, regional, and global carbon cycles and provide information at a variety of temporal and spatial scales. Much is known about the processes that regulate the carbon isotopic composition (δ 13 C) of leaf, plant, and ecosystem carbon pools and of photosynthetic and respiratory carbon dioxide (CO 2) fluxes. In this review, systematic patterns and mechanisms underlying variation in δ 13 C of plant and ecosystem carbon pools and fluxes are described. We examine the hypothesis that the δ 13 C of leaf biomass can be used as a reference point for other carbon pools and fluxes, which differ from the leaf in δ 13 C in a systematic fashion. Plant organs are typically enriched in 13 C relative to leaves, and most ecosystem pools and respiratory fluxes are enriched relative to sun leaves of dominant plants, with the notable exception of root respiration. Analysis of the chemical and isotopic composition of leaves and leaf respiration suggests that growth respiration has the potential to contribute substantially to the observed offset between the δ 13 C values of ecosystem respiration and the bulk leaf. We discuss the implications of systematic variations in δ 13 C of ecosystem pools and CO 2 fluxes for studies of carbon cycling within ecosystems, as well as for studies that use the δ 13 C of atmospheric CO 2 to diagnose changes in the terrestrial biosphere over annual to millennial time scales. Contents Summary 1 I. Introduction 2 II. Isotopic composition of plant metabolites and autotrophic respiration 3 III. Isotopic composition of plant and ecosystem carbon pools 8 IV. Isotopic composition of assimilation and respiration fluxes 9 V. Ecosystem to global scale issues – isotopic composition of gross primary production, net primary production, and net ecosystem production 11 VI. Conclusions and suggestions for further research 12 Acknowledgements 13 References 13

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02342.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 506

Metadata

Authors
Bowling, D. R., Pataki, D. E., & Randerson, J. T.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01-07
Volume
178
Issue
1
Pages
24-40
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2158405444
Cited by
506
References
3
FWCI
39.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon isotopes in terrestrial ecosystem pools and CO2 fluxes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02342.x
The paper
Bowling, D. R., Pataki, D. E., & Randerson, J. T. (2008). Carbon isotopes in terrestrial ecosystem pools and CO2 fluxes. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02342.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.