The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variations in satellite‐derived phenology in China's temperate vegetation
Abstract
The relationship between vegetation phenology and climate is a crucial topic in global change research because it indicates dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystems to climate changes. In this study, we investigate the possible impact of recent climate changes on growing season duration in the temperate vegetation of China, using the advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR)/normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) biweekly time‐series data collected from January 1982 to December 1999 and concurrent mean temperature and precipitation data. The results show that over the study period, the growing season duration has lengthened by 1.16 days yr−1 in temperate region of China. The green‐up of vegetation has advanced in spring by 0.79 days yr−1 and the dormancy delayed in autumn by 0.37 days yr−1. The dates of onset for phenological events are most significantly related with the mean temperature during the preceding 2–3 months. A warming in the early spring (March to early May) by 1°C could cause an earlier onset of green‐up of 7.5 days, whereas the same increase of mean temperature during autumn (mid‐August through early October) could lead to a delay of 3.8 days in vegetation dormancy. Variations in precipitation also influenced the duration of growing season, but such influence differed among vegetation types and phenological phases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological responses to recent climate change.
Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J. C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., & Bairlein, F. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416389a · Cited by 9,975
Cited by
Plant phenology and global climate change: Current progresses and challenges
Piao, S., Liu, Q., Chen, A., Janssens, I. A., Fu, Y., Dai, J., Liu, L., Lian, X., Shen, M., & Zhu, X. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14619 · Cited by 2,120
Self-citationTime‐lag effects of global vegetation responses to climate change
Wu, D., Zhao, X., Liang, S., Zhou, T., Huang, K., Tang, B., & Zhao, W. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12945 · Cited by 1,050
Piao, S., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Viovy, N., & Demarty, J. (2007) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2006gb002888 · Cited by 848
Self-citationRecent global decline of CO 2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis
Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Ju, W., Chen, J. M., Ciais, P., Cescatti, A., Sardans, J., Janssens, I. A., Wu, M., Berry, J. A., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb7772 · Cited by 697
Self-citationGe, W., Deng, L., Wang, F., & Han, J. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145648 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- PIAO, S., FANG, J., ZHOU, L., CIAIS, P., & ZHU, B.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-14
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 672-685
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2139429070
- Cited by
- 857
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variations in satellite‐derived phenology in China's temperate vegetation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01123.x
- The paper
- PIAO, S., FANG, J., ZHOU, L., CIAIS, P., & ZHU, B. (2006). Variations in satellite‐derived phenology in China's temperate vegetation. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01123.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
