The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time‐lag effects of global vegetation responses to climate change
Abstract
Climate conditions significantly affect vegetation growth in terrestrial ecosystems. Due to the spatial heterogeneity of ecosystems, the vegetation responses to climate vary considerably with the diverse spatial patterns and the time‐lag effects, which are the most important mechanism of climate–vegetation interactive effects. Extensive studies focused on large‐scale vegetation–climate interactions use the simultaneous meteorological and vegetation indicators to develop models; however, the time‐lag effects are less considered, which tends to increase uncertainty. In this study, we aim to quantitatively determine the time‐lag effects of global vegetation responses to different climatic factors using the GIMMS 3g NDVI time series and the CRU temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation datasets. First, this study analyzed the time‐lag effects of global vegetation responses to different climatic factors. Then, a multiple linear regression model and partial correlation model were established to statistically analyze the roles of different climatic factors on vegetation responses, from which the primary climate‐driving factors for different vegetation types were determined. The results showed that (i) both the time‐lag effects of the vegetation responses and the major climate‐driving factors that significantly affect vegetation growth varied significantly at the global scale, which was related to the diverse vegetation and climate characteristics; (ii) regarding the time‐lag effects, the climatic factors explained 64% variation of the global vegetation growth, which was 11% relatively higher than the model ignoring the time‐lag effects; (iii) for the area with a significant change trend (for the period 1982–2008) in the global GIMMS 3g NDVI (P < 0.05), the primary driving factor was temperature; and (iv) at the regional scale, the variation in vegetation growth was also related to human activities and natural disturbances. Considering the time‐lag effects is quite important for better predicting and evaluating the vegetation dynamics under the background of global climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological responses to recent climate change.
Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J. C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., & Bairlein, F. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416389a · Cited by 9,975
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2000) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1016218223 · Cited by 6,884
Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests
Bonan, G. B. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155121 · Cited by 6,238
Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3 .10 Dataset
Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., & Lister, D. H. (2014) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.3711 · Cited by 6,094
Climate Extremes: Observations, Modeling, and Impacts
Easterling, D. R., Meehl, G. A., Parmesan, C., Changnon, S. A., Karl, T. R., & Mearns, L. O. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5487.2068 · Cited by 4,867
Mitchell, T. D., & Jones, P. D. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1181 · Cited by 3,822
Climate-Driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999
Nemani, R. R., Keeling, C. D., Hashimoto, H., Jolly, W. M., Piper, S. C., Tucker, C. J., Myneni, R. B., & Running, S. W. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082750 · Cited by 3,671
MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets
Friedl, M. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Tan, B., Schneider, A., Ramankutty, N., Sibley, A., & Huang, X. (2010) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016 · Cited by 3,473
Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data
HOLBEN, B. N. (1986) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431168608948945 · Cited by 3,002
Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate
Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais, N., Rödenbeck, C., Arain, M. A., Baldocchi, D., Bonan, G. B., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1184984 · Cited by 2,831
Cited by
Global analysis of time-lag and -accumulation effects of climate on vegetation growth
Ding, Y., Li, Z., & Peng, S. (2020) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2020.102179 · Cited by 269
Serengeti–Masai Mara ecosystem dynamics inferred from rainfall extremes
Mtewele, Z. F., Jia, G., & Xu, X. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad01cb · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, D., Zhao, X., Liang, S., Zhou, T., Huang, K., Tang, B., & Zhao, W.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-19
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3520-3531
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2039361154
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 30.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time‐lag effects of global vegetation responses to climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.12945
- The paper
- Wu, D., Zhao, X., Liang, S., Zhou, T., Huang, K., Tang, B., & Zhao, W. (2015). Time‐lag effects of global vegetation responses to climate change. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12945
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.