The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland
Abstract
Northern peatlands contain up to 25% of the world's soil carbon (C) and have an estimated annual exchange of CO 2‐C with the atmosphere of 0.1–0.5 Pg yr−1 and of CH 4‐C of 10–25 Tg yr−1. Despite this overall importance to the global C cycle, there have been few, if any, complete multiyear annual C balances for these ecosystems. We report a 6‐year balance computed from continuous net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (NEE), regular instantaneous measurements of methane (CH 4) emissions, and export of dissolved organic C (DOC) from a northern ombrotrophic bog. From these observations, we have constructed complete seasonal and annual C balances, examined their seasonal and interannual variability, and compared the mean 6‐year contemporary C exchange with the apparent C accumulation for the last 3000 years obtained from C density and age‐depth profiles from two peat cores. The 6‐year mean NEE‐C and CH 4‐C exchange, and net DOC loss are −40.2±40.5 (±1 SD), 3.7±0.5, and 14.9±3.1 g m−2 yr−1, giving a 6‐year mean balance of −21.5±39.0 g m−2 yr−1 (where positive exchange is a loss of C from the ecosystem). NEE had the largest magnitude and variability of the components of the C balance, but DOC and CH 4 had similar proportional variabilities and their inclusion is essential to resolve the C balance. There are large interseasonal and interannual ranges to the exchanges due to variations in climatic conditions. We estimate from the largest and smallest seasonal exchanges, quasi‐maximum limits of the annual C balance between 50 and −105 g m−2 yr−1. The net C accumulation rate obtained from the two peatland cores for the interval 400–3000 bp (samples from the anoxic layer only) were 21.9±2.8 and 14.0±37.6 g m−2 yr−1, which are not significantly different from the 6‐year mean contemporary exchange.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peatlands and Global Change: Response and Resilience
Page, S. E., & Baird, A. J. (2016) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085520 · Cited by 396
Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from peatlands using vegetation as a proxy
Couwenberg, J., Thiele, A., Tanneberger, F., Augustin, J., Bärisch, S., Dubovik, D., Liashchynskaya, N., Michaelis, D., Minke, M., Skuratovich, A., et al. (2011) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-011-0729-x · Cited by 287
Villa, J. A., & Bernal, B. (2018) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.037 · Cited by 233
The role of waterborne carbon in the greenhouse gas balance of drained and re-wetted peatlands
Evans, C. D., Renou-Wilson, F., & Strack, M. (2016) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-015-0447-y · Cited by 139
Hemes, K. S., Chamberlain, S. D., Eichelmann, E., Anthony, T., Valach, A., Kasak, K., Szutu, D., Verfaillie, J., Silver, W. L., & Baldocchi, D. D. (2019) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.01.017 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- ROULET, N. T., LAFLEUR, P. M., RICHARD, P. J. H., MOORE, T. R., HUMPHREYS, E. R., & BUBIER, J.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 397-411
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W1991038692
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01292.x
- The paper
- ROULET, N. T., LAFLEUR, P. M., RICHARD, P. J. H., MOORE, T. R., HUMPHREYS, E. R., & BUBIER, J. (2007). Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01292.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.