The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitrite‐driven nitrous oxide production under aerobic soil conditions: kinetics and biochemical controls
Abstract
Nitrite (NO 2−) can accumulate during nitrification in soil following fertilizer application. While the role of NO 2− as a substrate regulating nitrous oxide (N 2 O) production is recognized, kinetic data are not available that allow for estimating N 2 O production or soil‐to‐atmosphere fluxes as a function of NO 2− levels under aerobic conditions. The current study investigated these kinetics as influenced by soil physical and biochemical factors in soils from cultivated and uncultivated fields in Minnesota, USA. A linear response of N 2 O production rate () to NO 2− was observed at concentrations below 60 μg N g−1 soil in both nonsterile and sterilized soils. Rate coefficients (Kp) relating to NO 2− varied over two orders of magnitude and were correlated with pH, total nitrogen, and soluble and total carbon (C). Total C explained 84% of the variance in Kp across all samples. Abiotic processes accounted for 31–75% of total N 2 O production. Biological reduction of NO 2− was enhanced as oxygen (O 2) levels were decreased from above ambient to 5%, consistent with nitrifier denitrification. In contrast, nitrate (NO 3−)‐reduction, and the reduction of N 2 O itself, were only stimulated at O 2 levels below 5%. Greater temperature sensitivity was observed for biological compared with chemical N 2 O production. Steady‐state model simulations predict that NO 2− levels often found after fertilizer applications have the potential to generate substantial N 2 O fluxes even at ambient O 2. This potential derives in part from the production of N 2 O under conditions not favorable for N 2 O reduction, in contrast to N 2 O generated from NO 3− reduction. These results have implications with regard to improved management to minimize agricultural N 2 O emissions and improved emissions assessments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhu, X., Burger, M., Doane, T. A., & Horwath, W. R. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1219993110 · Cited by 849
Saggar, S., Jha, N., Deslippe, J., Bolan, N. S., Luo, J., Giltrap, D. L., Kim, D.-G., Zaman, M., & Tillman, R. W. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.050 · Cited by 543
Nitrifier denitrification as a distinct and significant source of nitrous oxide from soil
Kool, D. M., Dolfing, J., Wrage, N., & Van Groenigen, J. W. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.030 · Cited by 490
Nitrous oxide emissions are enhanced in a warmer and wetter world
Griffis, T. J., Chen, Z., Baker, J. M., Wood, J. D., Millet, D. B., Lee, X., Venterea, R. T., & Turner, P. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1704552114 · Cited by 284
Self-citationLee, S.-I., Park, H.-J., Jeong, Y.-J., Seo, B.-S., Kwak, J.-H., Yang, H. I., Xu, X., Tang, S., Cheng, W., Lim, S.-S., et al. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118154 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- VENTEREA, R. T.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1798-1809
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2116316299
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrite‐driven nitrous oxide production under aerobic soil conditions: kinetics and biochemical controls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01389.x
- The paper
- VENTEREA, R. T. (2007). Nitrite‐driven nitrous oxide production under aerobic soil conditions: kinetics and biochemical controls. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01389.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.