The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world
Open accessAbstract
With the wide acceptance of forest‐protection policies in the developing world comes a requirement for clear demonstrations of how deforestation may erode human well‐being and economies. For centuries, it has been believed that forests provide protection against flooding. However, such claims have given rise to a heated polemic, and broad‐scale quantitative evidence of the possible role of forests in flood protection has not been forthcoming. Using data collected from 1990 to 2000 from 56 developing countries, we show using generalized linear and mixed‐effects models contrasted with information‐theoretic measures of parsimony that flood frequency is negatively correlated with the amount of remaining natural forest and positively correlated with natural forest area loss (after controlling for rainfall, slope and degraded landscape area). The most parsimonious models accounted for over 65% of the variation in flood frequency, of which nearly 14% was due to forest cover variables alone. During the decade investigated, nearly 100 000 people were killed and 320 million people were displaced by floods, with total reported economic damages exceeding US$1151 billion. Extracted measures of flood severity (flood duration, people killed and displaced, and total damage) showed some weaker, albeit detectable correlations to natural forest cover and loss. Based on an arbitrary decrease in natural forest area of 10%, the model‐averaged prediction of flood frequency increased between 4% and 28% among the countries modeled. Using the same hypothetical decline in natural forest area resulted in a 4–8% increase in total flood duration. These correlations suggest that global‐scale patterns in mean forest trends across countries are meaningful with respect to flood dynamics. Unabated loss of forests may increase or exacerbate the number of flood‐related disasters, negatively impact millions of poor people, and inflict trillions of dollars in damage in disadvantaged economies over the coming decades. This first global‐scale empirical demonstration that forests are correlated with flood risk and severity in developing countries reinforces the imperative for large‐scale forest protection to protect human welfare, and suggests that reforestation may help to reduce the frequency and severity of flood‐related catastrophes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World's Humid Tropical Forests
Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H.-J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T., & Malingreau, J.-P. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070656 · Cited by 1,993 · cited 5×
“Thus, the high rate at which forests are currently being lost (Laurance, 1999; Achard et al., 2002) has led to the hypothesis that natural habitat loss increases the risk and severity of extreme floods and their associated cost to human life and property (Clark, 1987).”
BackgroundInfluentialQuantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations.
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Barnett, D. N., Jones, G. S., Webb, M. J., Collins, M., & Stainforth, D. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02771 · Cited by 1,655
Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being
Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F. S., & Tilman, D. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277 · Cited by 1,544
Cited by
Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0120 · Cited by 2,024
Effects of tropical deforestation on climate and agriculture
Lawrence, D., & Vandecar, K. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2430 · Cited by 992
Extreme seasonal droughts and floods in Amazonia: causes, trends and impacts
Marengo, J. A., & Espinoza, J. C. (2016) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.4420 · Cited by 901
Global Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation
Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E. F. (2011) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-090710-143732 · Cited by 659
Kareiva, P., & Marvier, M. (2012) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.5 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- BRADSHAW, C. J. A., SODHI, N. S., PEH, K. S. ‐., & BROOK, B. W.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2379-2395
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2022052741
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01446.x
- The paper
- BRADSHAW, C. J. A., SODHI, N. S., PEH, K. S. ‐., & BROOK, B. W. (2007). Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01446.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.