CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 566

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Is Conservation Science?

Kareiva, Peter, Marvier, Michelle·2012·BioScience
DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In 1985, Michael Soulé asked, “What is conservation biology?” We revisit this question more than 25 years later and offer a revised set of core principles in light of the changed global context for conservation. Most notably, scientists now widely acknowledge that we live in a world dominated by humans, and therefore, the scientific underpinnings of conservation must include a consideration of the role of humans. Today's conservation science incorporates conservation biology into a broader interdisciplinary field that explicitly recognizes the tight coupling of social and natural systems. Emerging priorities include pursuing conservation within working landscapes, rebuilding public support, working with the corporate sector, and paying better attention to human rights and equity. We argue that in conservation, strategies must be promoted that simultaneously maximize the preservation of biodiversity and the improvement of human well-being.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conservation science and landscape ecology are inherently interdisciplinary.

    “Moreover, since conservation science and landscape ecology are inherently interdisciplinary56, this is an excellent opportunity to draw upon adjacent developments in the conservation social sciences57.”

    From Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [56]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Agarwal, 2009, Gender and forest conservation: The impact of women's participation in community forest governance, Ecological Economics, 68, 2785, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.025 · DOI
  2. Botkin, 1990, Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-First Century
  3. Bradshaw, 2007, Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world, Global Change Biology, 13, 2379, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01446.x · DOI
  4. Brechin, 2003, Contested Nature: Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-First Century, 10.1353/book4695 · DOI
  5. Cade, 2003, Return of the Peregrine: A North American Saga of Tenacity and Teamwork
  6. Cardinale, 2011, The beauty of simplicity in science: Baltic cod stock improves rapidly in a ‘cod hostile’ ecosystem state, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 425, 297, 10.3354/meps09098 · DOI
  7. Choudry, 2003, Conservation International: Privatizing nature, plundering biodiversity, 17
  8. Cincotta, 2000, Human populations in the biodiversity hotspots, Nature, 404, 990, 10.1038/35010105 · DOI
  9. Corsolini, 2006, Occurrence of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and their enantiomeric signatures, and concentrations of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in the Adélie penguin food web, Antarctica, Environmental Pollution, 140, 371, 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.04.039 · DOI
  10. Daily, 2003, Countryside biogeography of Neotropical mammals: Conservation opportunities in agricultural landscapes of Costa Rica, Conservation Biology, 17, 1814, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00298.x · DOI
  11. Das, 2009, Mangroves protected villages and reduced death toll during Indian super cyclone, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 7357, 10.1073/pnas.0810440106 · DOI
  12. Dowie, 2009, Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Conflict between Global Conservation and Native Peoples, 10.7551/mitpress/7532.001.0001 · DOI
  13. Ehrlich, 2005, Millennium assessment of human behavior, Science, 309, 562, 10.1126/science.1113028 · DOI
  14. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, 1992, Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 2420, 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032 · DOI
  15. Folke, 2011, Reconnecting to the biosphere, Ambio, 40, 719, 10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y · DOI
  16. Franzen, 2010, Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000, European Sociological Review, 26, 219, 10.1093/esr/jcp018 · DOI
  17. Friedman, 2005, The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century
  18. Guha, 1989, Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A third world critique, Environmental Ethics, 11, 71, 10.5840/enviroethics198911123 · DOI
  19. Halpern, 2008, A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems, Science, 319, 948, 10.1126/science.1149345 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hardin, 1968, The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, 1243, 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
  21. He, 2011, Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss, Nature, 473, 368, 10.1038/nature09985 · DOI
  22. Heath, 2010, Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard
  23. Hobbs, 2009, Novel ecosystems: Implications for conservation and restoration, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 599, 10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Howes, 2010, Building a market for sustainable fisheries
  25. Janzen, 1986, The future of tropical ecology, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 305, 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.001513 · DOI
  26. Jones, 2009, Rapid recovery of damaged ecosystems, PLOS ONE, 4, 10.1371/journal.pone.0005653 · DOI
  27. Kaiser, 2001, The other global pollutant: Nitrogen proves tough to curb, Science, 294, 1268, 10.1126/science.294.5545.1268 · DOI
  28. Kareiva, 2012, Dam choices: Analyses for multiple needs, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 5553, 10.1073/pnas.1203263109 · DOI
  29. Kareiva, 2008, Development and conservation goals in World Bank projects, Science, 321, 1638, 10.1126/science.1162756 · DOI
  30. Levy, 2012, Rise of the coyote: The new top dog, Nature, 485, 296, 10.1038/485296a · DOI
  31. Lewis, 2003, Cattle and conservation at Bharatpur: A case study in science and advocacy, Conservation and Society, 1, 1
  32. Liu, 2007, Complexity of coupled human and natural systems, Science, 317, 1513, 10.1126/science.1144004 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Lugo, 1988, Estimating reductions in the diversity of tropical forest species, 58
  34. Margules, 2000, Systematic conservation planning, Nature, 405, 243, 10.1038/35012251 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Martinez, 2003, Protected areas, indigenous peoples, and the Western idea of nature, Ecological Restoration, 21, 247, 10.3368/er.21.4.247 · DOI
  36. Mascia, 2011, Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications, Conservation Letters, 4, 9, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00147.x · DOI
  37. Mascia, 2003, Conservation and the social sciences, Conservation Biology, 17, 649, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x · DOI
  38. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
  39. Miller, 2005, Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 430, 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013 · DOI
  40. Milner-Gulland, 1993, An econometric analysis of consumer demand for ivory and rhino horn, Environmental and Resource Economics, 3, 73, 10.1007/BF00338321 · DOI
  41. NASA, 2012, GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
  42. National Research Council, 2009, Global Sources of Local Pollution: An Assessment of Long-Range Transport of Key Air Pollutants to and from the United States
  43. Naylor, 2005, The underworld of ivory, Crime, Law and Social Change, 42, 261, 10.1007/s10611-005-2143-7 · DOI
  44. Nelson, 2008, The Wilderness Debate Rages On: Continuing the Great New Wilderness Debate
  45. Nordhaus, 2007, Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility
  46. Opperman, 2009, Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers, Science, 326, 1487, 10.1126/science.1178256 · DOI
  47. Ostrom, 2006, Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 19224, 10.1073/pnas.0607962103 · DOI
  48. Pearce, 2012, The Land Grabbers: The New Fight over Who Owns the Earth
  49. Pergams, 2008, Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 2295, 10.1073/pnas.0709893105 · DOI
  50. Planning Evolution Team, 2011, Planning for Tomorrow's Challenges: Recommendations of the Planning Evolution Team
  51. Polasky, 2005, Conserving species in a working landscape: Land use with biological and economic objectives, Ecological Applications, 15, 1387, 10.1890/03-5423 · DOI
  52. Postel, 1996, Human appropriation of renewable fresh water, Science, 271, 785, 10.1126/science.271.5250.785 · DOI
  53. Richards, 2008, Bikini Atoll coral biodiversity resilience five decades after nuclear testing, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56, 503, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.11.018 · DOI
  54. Rio, 2008, Rio Tinto and Biodiversity: Achieving Results on the Ground
  55. Salafsky, 2011, Integrating development with conservation: A means to a conservation end, or a mean end to conservation?, Biological Conservation, 144, 973, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.003 · DOI
  56. Sanderson, 2002, The human footprint and the last of the wild, BioScience, 52, 891, 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  57. Sarkar, 2005, Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy: An Introduction, 10.1017/CBO9780511498558 · DOI
  58. Shandra, 2008, Women, non-governmental organizations and deforestation: A cross-national study, Population and Environment, 30, 48, 10.1007/s11111-008-0073-x · DOI
  59. Smith, 2005, Decade of the Wolf: Returning the Wild to Yellowstone
  60. Soulé, 1985, What is conservation biology?, BioScience, 35, 727, 10.2307/1310054 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Stewart, 2005, Applying evidence-based practice in conservation management: Lessons from the first systematic review and dissemination projects, Biological Conservation, 126, 270, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.003 · DOI
  62. Vijayan, 1987, Keoladeo National Park Ecology Study: Report Jan to June 1987
  63. Waylen, 2010, Effect of local cultural context on the success of community-based conservation interventions, Conservation Biology, 24, 1119, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01446.x · DOI
  64. Williams, 2012, The human-environment dialog in award-winning children's picture books, Sociological Inquiry, 82, 145, 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2011.00399.x · DOI
  65. Willis, 2004, How “virgin” is virgin rainforest?, Science, 304, 402, 10.1126/science.1093991 · DOI
  66. Wilshusen, 2002, Reinventing a square wheel: Critique of a resurgent “protection paradigm” in international biodiversity conservation, Society and Natural Resources, 15, 17, 10.1080/089419202317174002 · DOI
  67. Wilson, 2007, Conserving biodiversity efficiently: What to do, where, and when, PLOS Biology, 5, 1850, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050223 · DOI
  68. Zaradic, 2009, The impact of nature experience on willingness to support conservation, PLOS ONE, 4, 10.1371/journal.pone.0007367 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kareiva, P., & Marvier, M.
Venue
BioScience
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2012-11
Volume
62
Issue
11
Pages
962-969
ISSN
  • 1525-3244
  • 0006-3568
DOI
10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.5
Cited by
566
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review