The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Revising a process‐based biogeochemistry model (DNDC) to simulate methane emission from rice paddy fields under various residue management and fertilizer regimes
Abstract
A comprehensive biogeochemistry model, DNDC, was revised to simulate crop growth and soil processes more explicitly and improve its ability to estimate methane (CH 4) emission from rice paddy fields under a wide range of climatic and agronomic conditions. The revised model simulates rice growth by tracking photosynthesis, respiration, C allocation, tillering, and release of organic C and O 2 from roots. For anaerobic soil processes, it quantifies the production of electron donors [H 2 and dissolved organic carbon (DOC)] by decomposition and rice root exudation, and simulates CH 4 production and other reductive reactions based on the availability of electron donors and acceptors (NO 3−, Mn 4+, Fe 3+, and SO 42−). Methane emission through rice is simulated by a diffusion routine based on the conductance of tillers and the CH 4 concentration in soil water. The revised DNDC was tested against observations at three rice paddy sites in Japan and China with varying rice residue management and fertilization, and produced estimates consistent with observations for the variation in CH 4 emission as a function of residue management. It also successfully predicted the negative effect of (NH 4)2 SO 4 on CH 4 emission, which the current model missed. Predicted CH 4 emission was highly sensitive to the content of reducible soil Fe 3+, which is the dominant electron acceptor in anaerobic soils. The revised DNDC generally gave acceptable predictions of seasonal CH 4 emission, but not of daily CH 4 fluxes, suggesting the model's immaturity in describing soil heterogeneity or rice cultivar‐specific characteristics of CH 4 transport. It also overestimated CH 4 emission at one site in a year with low temperatures, suggesting uncertainty in root biomass estimates due to the model's failure to consider the temperature dependence of leaf area development. Nevertheless, the revised DNDC explicitly reflects the effects of soil electron donors and acceptors, and can be used to quantitatively estimate CH 4 emissions from rice fields under a range of conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brilli, L., Bechini, L., Bindi, M., Carozzi, M., Cavalli, D., Conant, R., Dorich, C. D., Doro, L., Ehrhardt, F., Farina, R., et al. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.208 · Cited by 244
Contribution of periphytic biofilm of paddy soils to carbon dioxide fixation and methane emissions
Wang, S., Sun, P., Zhang, G., Gray, N., Dolfing, J., Esquivel-Elizondo, S., Peñuelas, J., & Wu, Y. (2022) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100192 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- FUMOTO, T., KOBAYASHI, K., LI, C., YAGI, K., & HASEGAWA, T.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-29
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 382-402
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2108266666
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revising a process‐based biogeochemistry model (DNDC) to simulate methane emission from rice paddy fields under various residue management and fertilizer regimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01475.x
- The paper
- FUMOTO, T., KOBAYASHI, K., LI, C., YAGI, K., & HASEGAWA, T. (2008). Revising a process‐based biogeochemistry model (DNDC) to simulate methane emission from rice paddy fields under various residue management and fertilizer regimes. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01475.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.