Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Climate‐related trends in Australian vegetation cover as inferred from satellite observations, 1981–2006

DONOHUE, RANDALL J., McVICAR, TIM R., RODERICK, MICHAEL L.·2009·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Using Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer data spanning 1981–2006 and calibrated for long‐term analyses of vegetation dynamics, we examine whether vegetation cover has increased across Australia and whether there has been a differential response of vegetation functional types in response to changes in climatic growing conditions. Trends in vegetation cover are interpreted within Budyko's energy – water limitation framework. Results from an Australia‐wide analysis indicate that vegetation cover (as described by the fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation absorbed by vegetation; fPAR) has increased, on average, by 0.0007 per year – an increase of ∼8% over the 26 years. The majority of this change is due to a 0.0010 per year increase in persistent fPAR (representing nondeciduous perennial vegetation types; up 21%). In contrast, recurrent fPAR (representing deciduous, annual and ephemeral vegetation types) decreased, on average, by 0.0003 per year (down 7%), the trends of which are highly seasonal. Over the same period, Australian average annual precipitation increased by 1.3 mm yr−2 (up 7%). A site‐based analysis using 90 long‐term meteorological stations with minimal localized land‐cover changes showed that energy‐limited sites where total fPAR increased generally experienced decreases in precipitation, and water‐limited sites that experienced decreases in cover were almost always associated with decreases in precipitation. Interestingly, where vegetation cover increased at water‐limited sites, precipitation trends were variable indicating that this is not the only factor driving vegetation response. As Australia is a generally highly water‐limited environment, these findings indicate that the effective availability of water to plants has increased on average over the study period. Results also show that persistent vegetation types have benefited more than recurrent types from recent changes in growing conditions. Regardless of what has been driving these changes, the overall response of vegetation over the past 2–3 decades has resulted in an observable greening of the driest inhabited continent on Earth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01746.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
DONOHUE, R. J., McVICAR, T. R., & RODERICK, M. L.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-25
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
1025-1039
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W1989994082
Cited by
346
References
0
FWCI
16.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate‐related trends in Australian vegetation cover as inferred from satellite observations, 1981–2006. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01746.x
The paper
DONOHUE, R. J., McVICAR, T. R., & RODERICK, M. L. (2009). Climate‐related trends in Australian vegetation cover as inferred from satellite observations, 1981–2006. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01746.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.