The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulation of microbial extracellular enzyme activities by elevated CO2 depends on soil aggregate size
Open accessAbstract
Increased belowground carbon (C) transfer by plant roots at elevated CO 2 may change properties of the microbial community in the rhizosphere. Previous investigations that focused on total soil organic C or total microbial C showed contrasting results: small increase, small decrease or no changes. We evaluated the effect of 5 years of elevated CO 2 (550 ppm) on four extracellular enzymes: β‐glucosidase, chitinase, phosphatase, and sulfatase. We expected microorganisms to be differently localized in aggregates of various sizes and, therefore analyzed microbial biomass (C mic by SIR) and enzyme activities in three aggregate‐size classes: large macro‐ (> 2 mm), small macro‐ (0.25–2 mm), and microaggregates (< 0.25 mm). To estimate the potential enzyme production, we activated microorganisms by substrate (glucose and nutrients) amendment. Although C total and C mic as well as the activities of β‐glucosidase, phosphatase, and sulfatase were unaffected in bulk soil and in aggregate‐size classes by elevated CO 2, significant changes were observed in potential enzyme production after substrate amendment. After adding glucose, enzyme activities under elevated CO 2 were 1.2–1.9‐fold higher than under ambient CO 2. This indicates the increased activity of microorganisms, which leads to accelerated C turnover in soil under elevated CO 2. Significantly higher chitinase activity in bulk soil and in large macroaggregates under elevated CO 2 revealed an increased contribution of fungi to turnover processes. At the same time, less chitinase activity in microaggregates underlined microaggregate stability and the difficulties for fungal hyphae penetrating them. We conclude that quantitative and qualitative changes of C input by plants into the soil at elevated CO 2 affect microbial community functioning, but not its total content. Future studies should therefore focus more on the changes of functions and activities, but less on the pools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Soil structure and management: a review
Bronick, C. J., & Lal, R. (2005) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005 · Cited by 4,463
The use of fluorogenic substrates to measure fungal presence and activity in soil
Miller, M., Palojärvi, A., Rangger, A., Reeslev, M., & Kjøller, A. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.2.613-617.1998 · Cited by 204
Rogers, A., Fischer, B. U., Bryant, J., Frehner, M., Blum, H., Raines, C. A., & Long, S. P. (1998) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.118.2.683 · Cited by 203
Cotrufo, M. F., De Angelis, P., & Polle, A. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00958.x · Cited by 100
Cited by
Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions
Burns, R. G., DeForest, J. L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Stromberger, M. E., Wallenstein, M. D., Weintraub, M. N., & Zoppini, A. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009 · Cited by 2,552
Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
Self-citationMicroplastics in the agroecosystem: Are they an emerging threat to the plant-soil system?
Zang, H., Zhou, J., Marshall, M. R., Chadwick, D. R., Wen, Y., & Jones, D. L. (2020) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107926 · Cited by 420
Soil organic matter priming: The pH effects
Wang, C., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2024) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.17349 · Cited by 382
Self-citationTrivedi, P., Rochester, I. J., Trivedi, C., Van Nostrand, J. D., Zhou, J., Karunaratne, S., Anderson, I. C., & Singh, B. K. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.034 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- DORODNIKOV, M., BLAGODATSKAYA, E., BLAGODATSKY, S., MARHAN, S., FANGMEIER, A., & KUZYAKOV, Y.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1603-1614
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W1963913857
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulation of microbial extracellular enzyme activities by elevated CO2 depends on soil aggregate size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01844.x
- The paper
- DORODNIKOV, M., BLAGODATSKAYA, E., BLAGODATSKY, S., MARHAN, S., FANGMEIER, A., & KUZYAKOV, Y. (2009). Stimulation of microbial extracellular enzyme activities by elevated CO2 depends on soil aggregate size. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01844.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.