The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA
Abstract
The effectiveness of a system of reserves may be compromised under climate change as species' habitat shifts to nonreserved areas, a problem that may be compounded when well‐studied vertebrate species are used as conservation umbrellas for other taxa. The Northwest Forest Plan was among the first efforts to integrate conservation of wide‐ranging focal species and localized endemics into regional conservation planning. We evaluated how effectively the plan's focal species, the Northern Spotted Owl, acts as an umbrella for localized species under current and projected future climates and how the regional system of reserves can be made more resilient to climate change. We used the program maxent to develop distribution models integrating climate data with vegetation variables for the owl and 130 localized species. We used the program zonation to identify a system of areas that efficiently captures habitat for both the owl and localized species and prioritizes refugial areas of climatic and topographic heterogeneity where current and future habitat for dispersal‐limited species is in proximity. We projected future species' distributions based on an ensemble of contrasting climate models, and incorporating uncertainty between alternate climate projections into the prioritization process. Reserve solutions based on the owl overlap areas of high localized‐species richness but poorly capture core areas of localized species' distribution. Congruence between priority areas across taxa increases when refugial areas are prioritized. Although core‐area selection strategies can potentially increase the conservation value and resilience of regional reserve systems, they accentuate contrasts in priority areas between species and over time and should be combined with a broadened taxonomic scope and increased attention to potential effects of climate change. Our results suggest that systems of fixed reserves designed for resilience can increase the likelihood of retaining the biological diversity of forest ecosystems under climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oliver, T. H., & Morecroft, M. D. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.271 · Cited by 613
Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation
Lehtomäki, J., & Moilanen, A. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.001 · Cited by 454
Self-citationMulti-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky Mountains
Cushman, S. A., & Landguth, E. L. (2012) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.011 · Cited by 120
Wade, A. A., McKelvey, K. S., & Schwartz, M. K. (2015) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-gtr-333 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- CARROLL, C., DUNK, J. R., & MOILANEN, A.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-31
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 891-904
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2111931246
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01965.x
- The paper
- CARROLL, C., DUNK, J. R., & MOILANEN, A. (2010). Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01965.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.