CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resistance-surface-based wildlife conservation connectivity modeling: Summary of efforts in the United States and guide for practitioners

Wade, Alisa A., McKelvey, Kevin S., Schwartz, Michael K.·2015
DOI 10.2737/rmrs-gtr-333
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2737/rmrs-gtr-333

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many modeling workflows for connectivity analysis are constrained by computational demand.

    “However, once the surface is created and used as input for a connectivity analysis, many modeling workflows share the trait of being constrained by computational demand [15,22,25,26], as representing spatial patterns in a cumulative process like connectivity requires extensive calculations, often across millions of pixels.”

    From Circuitscape in julia: empowering dynamic approaches to connectivity assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Anderson, A., and C.N. Jenkins. 2006. Applying nature's design: Corridors as a strategy for biodiversity conservation. New York: Columbia University Press.
  2. Beckmann, J.P., A.P. Clevenger, M. Huijser, and J. Hilty. 2010. Safe passages: Highways, wildlife, and habitat connectivity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  3. Beier, P., D.R. Majka, and W.D. Spencer. 2008. Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conservation Biology. 22: 836-851.
  4. Bennett, A.F., K.R. Crooks, and M.A. Sanjayan. 2006. The future of connectivity conservation. Pages 676-694 in K.R. Crooks and M.A. Sanjayan, editors. Connectivity conservation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Brown, D.D., S. LaPoint, R. Kays, W. Heidrich, F. Kümmeth, and M. Wikelski. 2012. Accelerometer- informed GPS telemetry: Reducing the trade-off between resolution and longevity. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 36: 139-146.
  6. Bunn, A.G., D.L. Urban, and T.H. Keitt. 2000. Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management. 59: 265-278.
  7. Carroll, C. 2006. Linking connectivity to viability: insights from spatially explicit population models of large carnivores. Pages 369-389 in K.R. Crooks and M. A. Sanjayan, editors. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  8. Chetkiewicz, C.-L.B., and M.S. Boyce. 2009. Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46: 1036-1047.
  9. Chetkiewicz, C.-L.B., C.C. St. Clair, and M. S. Boyce. 2006. Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 37:317-342.
  10. Copeland, J.P., J.M. Peek, C.R. Groves, W.E. Melquist, K.S. Mckelvey, G.W. McDaniel, C.D. Long, and C.E. Harris. 2007. Seasonal habitat associations of the wolverine in central Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71: 2201-2212.
  11. Crist, T.O., D.S. Guertin, J.A. Wiens, and B.T. Milne. 1992. Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes: an experiment with Eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie. Functional Ecology. 6(5): 536-544.
  12. Crooks, J.A., and A. V. Suarez. 2006. Hyperconnectivity, invasive species, and the breakdown of barriers to dispersal. Pages 451-478 in K.R. Crooks and M. A. Sanjayan, editors. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  13. Crooks, K.R., and M.A. Sanjayan. 2006. Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature. Pages 1-19 in K.R. Crooks and M.A. Sanjayan, editors. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge Univer- sity Press, New York, NY.
  14. Cushman, S.A. 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation .128: 231-240.
  15. Epps, C. W., J. D. Wehausen, V. C. Bleich, S. G. Torres, and J. S. Brashares. 2007. Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. Journal of Applied Ecology. 44: 714-724.
  16. Fagan, W.F., and J.M. Calabrese. 2006. Quantifying connectivity: balancing metric performance with data requirements. Pages 297-317 in K.R. Crooks and M.A. Sanjayan, editors. Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  17. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 34: 487-515.
  18. Falcucci, A., L. Maiorano, P. Ciucci, E.O. Garton, and L. Boitani. 2008. Land-cover change and the future of the Apennine brown bear: a perspective from the past. Journal of Mammalogy. 89: 1502-1511.
  19. Feinberg, J. 2007. Conserving the connections: a nationwide inventory of state-based habitat connectivity analysis. Pages 313-327 in C.L. Irwin, D. Nelson, and K.P. McDermott, editors. Proceedings of the 2007 International conference on ecology and transportation. Center for Transportation and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8m66f5gc. (February 22, 2013).
  20. Forman, R.T.T., and L. E. Alexander. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 29: 207-231.
  21. Franklin, J.F., and D.B. Lindenmayer. 2009. Importance of matrix habitats in maintaining biological di- versity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106: 349-350.
  22. Fredman, M.L., and R.E. Tarjan. 1987. Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms. Journal of the ACM. 34: 596-615.
  23. Galpern, P., and M. Manseau. 2013. Modelling the influence of landscape connectivity on animal distribu- tion: a functional grain approach. Ecography: doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.00081.x. · DOI
  24. Gavashelishvili, A., and V. Lukarevskiy. 2008. Modelling the habitat requirements of leopard Panthera pardus in west and central Asia. Journal of Applied Ecology. 45: 579-588.
  25. Gilbert-Norton, L., R. Wilson, J.R. Stevens, and K.H. Beard. 2010. A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conservation Biology. 24: 660-668.
  26. Grilo, C., F. Ascensao, M. Santos-Reis, and J.A. Bissonette. 2011. Do well-connected landscapes promote road-related mortality? European Journal of Wildlife Research. 57: 707-716.
  27. Guisan, A., and W. Thuiller. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology letters. 8: 993-1009.
  28. Heller, N.E., and E.S. Zavaleta. 2009. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation. 142: 14-32.
  29. Hilty, J.A., W.Z. Lidicker, and A.M. Merenlender. 2006. Corridor ecology: The science and practice of linking landscapes for biodiversity conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  30. Hodgson, J.A., A. Moilanen, B.A. Wintle, and C.D. Thomas. 2011. Habitat area, quality and connectivity: striking the balance for efficient conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology. 48: 148-152.
  31. Hodgson, J.A., C.D. Thomas, B.A. Wintle, and A. Moilanen. 2009. Climate change, connectivity and con- servation decision making: back to basics. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46: 964-969.
  32. Holyoak, M. 2000. Habitat subdivision causes changes in food web structure. Ecology Letters 3: 509-515.
  33. Hudy, M., J.A. Coombs, K.H. Nislow, and B.H. Letcher. 2010. Dispersal and within-stream spatial popula- tion structure of brook trout revealed by pedigree reconstruction analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 139: 1276-1287.
  34. Janin, A., J.-P. Léna, N. Ray, C. Delacourt, P. Allemand, and P. Joly. 2009. Assessing landscape connectivity with calibrated cost-distance modelling: predicting common toad distribution in a context of spreading agriculture. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46: 833-841.
  35. Jules, E.S., and P. Shahani. 2003. A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important than we thought. Journal of Vegetation Science. 14: 459-464.
  36. Kindall, J.L., and F.T. Van Manen. 2007. Identifying habitat linkages for American black bears in North Carolina, USA. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71: 487-495.
  37. Kindlmann, P., and F. Burel. 2008. Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecology. 23: 879-890.
  38. Klaassen, R.H., R. Strandberg, M. Hake, P. Olofsson, A.P. Tøttrup, and T. Alerstam. 2010. Loop migration in adult marsh harriers Circus aeruginosus, as revealed by satellite telemetry. Journal of Avian Biology. 41: 200-207.
  39. Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments: Some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  40. Levins, R. 1969a. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for bio- logical control. Bulletin of the ESA. 15: 237-240.
  41. Levins, R. 1969b. The effect of random variations of different types on population growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 62: 1061-1065.
  42. Levins, R. 1970. Extinction. Pages 77-107 in M. Desternhaber, editor. Some mathematical problems in biology. Amercian Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
  43. Lindenmayer, D., R.J. Hobbs, R. Montague-Drake, [and others]. 2008. A checklist for ecological manage- ment of landscapes for conservation. Ecology letters. 11: 78-91.
  44. Lindenmayer, D.B., and J. Fischer. 2006. Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: An ecological and conservation synthesis. Island Press, Covelo, CA.
  45. MacArthur, R.H., and E.O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
  46. McRae B.H., S.A. Hall, P. Beier, and D.M. Theobald. 2012. Where to restore ecological connectivity? Detecting barriers and quantifying restoration benefits. PLoS ONE 7: e52604. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052604. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Merriam, G. 1984. Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. Proceedings of the International Association for Landscape Ecology. 1: 5-15.
  48. Moorcroft, P.R., M.A. Lewis, and R.L. Crabtree. 2006. Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biologi- cal Sciences. 273: 1651-1659.
  49. Muhlfeld, C.C., S.R. Thorrold, T.E. McMahon, B. Marotz, and B. Gillanders. 2012. Estimating westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi) movements in a river network using strontium isoscapes. Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences 69: 906-915.
  50. Murray, J.V., A.W. Goldizen, R.A. O'Leary, C.A. McAlpine, H.P. Possingham, and S.L. Choy. 2009. How useful is expert opinion for predicting the distribution of a species within and beyond the region of expertise? A case study using brush-tailed rock-wallabies Petrogale penicillata. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46: 842-851.
  51. NJDFW (New Jersey Division of Fish And Wildlife). 2012. New Jersey landscape project, version 3.1: Wildlife habitat mapping for community land-use planning and species conservation. New Jersey De- partment of Environmental Protection, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Endangered and Nongame Species Program. 33 p. Noon, B.R., and K.S. McKelvey. 1996. Management of the spotted owl: a case history in conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 27: 135-162.
  52. Prevedello, J., and M. Vieira. 2010. Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodiversity and Conservation. 19: 1205-1223.
  53. Russell, R.E., J.A. Royle, R. Desimone, M.K. Schwartz, V.L. Edwards, K.P. Pilgrim, and K.S. McKelvey. 2012. Estimating abundance of mountain lions from unstructured spatial sampling. Journal of Wildlife Management. 76: 1551-1561.
  54. Sargent, R.G. 1982. Verification and validation of simulation models. Pages 159-169 in F.E. Cellier, editor. Progress in modelling and simulation. London: Academic Press.
  55. Sargent, R.G. 2009. Validation and verification of simulation models. Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Winter Simulation. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  56. Sargent, R.G. 2012. Verification and validation of simulation models. Journal of Simulation. 7:12-24.
  57. Saunders, D.A., R.J. Hobbs, and C.R. Margules. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmenta- tion: a review. Conservation Biology. 5: 18-32.
  58. Sawaya, Michael A., Steven T. Kalinowski, and Anthony P. Clevenger 2014. Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 281: 20131705.
  59. Sawyer, S.C., C.W. Epps, and J.S. Brashares. 2011. Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least- cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? Journal of Applied Ecology. 48: 668-678.
  60. Schultz, C.A., T.D. Sisk, B.R. Noon, and M.A. Nie. 2013. Wildlife conservation planning under the United States Forest Service's 2012 planning rule. Journal of Wildlife Management. 77: 428-444.
  61. Sepulveda, A.J., W.T. Colyer, W.H. Lowe, and M.R. Vinson. 2009. Using nitrogen stable isotopes to detect long-distance movement in a threatened cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii utah). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 66: 672-682.
  62. Sinclair, A.R.E. 1983. The function of distance movements in vertebrates. Pages 240-258 in I.
  63. R. Swingland and P.J. Greenwood, editors. The Ecology of Animal Movement. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
  64. Squires, J.R., J.P. Copeland, T.J. Ulizio, M.K. Schwartz, and L.F. Ruggiero. 2007. Sources and patterns of wolverine mortality in western Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71: 2213-2220.
  65. Taylor, P.D., L. Fahrig, and K.A. With. 2006. Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. Pages 29-43 in K.R. Crooks and M.A. Sanjayan, editors. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  66. Tewksbury, J.J., D.J. Levey, N.M. Haddad, S. Sargent, J.L. Orrock, A. Weldon, B.J. Danielson, J. Brinkerhoff, E.I. Damschen, and P. Townsend. 2002. Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in frag- mented landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99: 12923-12926.
  67. Theobald, D.M. 2005. A note on creating robust resistance surfaces for computing functional landscape connectivity. Ecology and Society 10(2): r1. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/resp1/. (October 17, 2012).
  68. Theobald, D.M., S.E. Reed, K. Fields, and M. Soulé. 2012. Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters. 5: 123-133.
  69. Thorne, J.H., D. Cameron, and J.F. Quinn. 2006. A conservation design for the Central Coast of California and the evaluation of mountain lion as an umbrella species. Natural Areas Journal. 26: 137-148.
  70. Trumbo, D.R., S.F. Spear, J. Baumsteiger, and A. Storfer. 2013. Rangewide landscape genetics of an endemic Pacific northwestern salamander. Molecular Ecology. 22(5): 1250-1266. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/mec.12168/full. (August 22, 2013). · DOI
  71. Turner, M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 20: 171-197.
  72. Turner, M.G., R.H. Gardner, and R.V. O'Neill. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer- Verlag Inc., New York, NY.
  73. Varela, S., J. Rodríguez, and J.M. Lobo. 2009. Is current climatic equilibrium a guarantee for the transfer- ability of distribution model predictions? A case study of the spotted hyena. Journal of Biogeography. 36: 1645-1655.
  74. Vashon, J.H., A.L. Meehan, W.J. Jakubas, J.F. Organ, A.D. Vashon, C.R. McLaughlin, G.J. Matula, and S.M. Crowley. 2008. Spatial ecology of a Canada lynx population in northern Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management. 72: 1479-1487.
  75. Vos, C.C., H. Baveco, and C.J. Grashof-Bokdam. 2002. Corridors and species dispersal. Chapter 6 in Kevin J. Gutzwiller, editor. Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  76. Walker, R., and L. Craighead. 1997. Analyzing wildlife movement corridors in Montana using GIS. Pro- ceedings of the 1997 International ESRI Users conference. San Diego, CA. http://gis.esri.com/library/ userconf/proc97/proc97/to150/pap116/p116.htm.
  77. Weber, T.C. 2007a. Development and application of a statewide conservation network in Delaware. Journal of Conservation Planning. 3: 17-46.
  78. Wiens, J.A. 1997. The emerging role of patchiness in conservation biology. Pages 93-107 in S. T. Pickett, editor. The ecological basis of conservation: Heterogeneity, Ecosystems, and Biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
  79. Zeller, K., K. McGarigal, and A. Whiteley. 2012. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecology. 27: 777-797.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wade, A. A., McKelvey, K. S., & Schwartz, M. K.
Publisher
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
Published
2015
DOI
10.2737/rmrs-gtr-333
Cited by
51
References
5

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review