Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantifying the hydrological responses to climate change in an intact forested small watershed in Southern China

Zhou, Guoyi, Wei, Xiaohua, Wu, Yiping, Liu, Shuguang, Huang, Yuhui, Yan, Junhua, Zhang, Deqiang, Zhang, Qianmei, Liu, Juxiu, Meng, Ze, Wang, Chunlin, Chu, Guowei, Liu, Shizhong, Tang, Xuli, Liu, Xiaodong·2011·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Responses of hydrological processes to climate change are key components in the I ntergovernmental P anel for C limate C hange (IPCC) assessment. Understanding these responses is critical for developing appropriate mitigation and adaptation strategies for sustainable water resources management and protection of public safety. However, these responses are not well understood and little long‐term evidence exists. Herein, we show how climate change, specifically increased air temperature and storm intensity, can affect soil moisture dynamics and hydrological variables based on both long‐term observation and model simulations using the S oil and W ater A ssessment T ool (SWAT) in an intact forested watershed (the D inghushan B iosphere R eserve) in S outhern C hina. Our results show that, although total annual precipitation changed little from 1950 to 2009, soil moisture decreased significantly. A significant decline was also found in the monthly 7‐day low flow from 2000 to 2009. However, the maximum daily streamflow in the wet season and unconfined groundwater tables have significantly increased during the same 10‐year period. The significant decreasing trends on soil moisture and low flow variables suggest that the study watershed is moving towards drought‐like condition. Our analysis indicates that the intensification of rainfall storms and the increasing number of annual no‐rain days were responsible for the increasing chance of both droughts and floods. We conclude that climate change has indeed induced more extreme hydrological events (e.g. droughts and floods) in this watershed and perhaps other areas of S outhern C hina. This study also demonstrated usefulness of our research methodology and its possible applications on quantifying the impacts of climate change on hydrology in any other watersheds where long‐term data are available and human disturbance is negligible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02499.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, G., Wei, X., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Huang, Y., Yan, J., Zhang, D., Zhang, Q., Liu, J., Meng, Z., Wang, C., Chu, G., Liu, S., Tang, X., & Liu, X.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-02
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
3736-3746
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2001258256
Cited by
271
References
41
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the hydrological responses to climate change in an intact forested small watershed in Southern China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02499.x
The paper
Zhou, G., Wei, X., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Huang, Y., Yan, J., Zhang, D., Zhang, Q., Liu, J., Meng, Z., Wang, C., Chu, G., Liu, S., Tang, X., & Liu, X. (2011). Quantifying the hydrological responses to climate change in an intact forested small watershed in Southern China. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02499.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.