The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Biological invasions are a global phenomenon that threatens biodiversity, and few, if any, ecosystems are free from alien species. The outcome of human‐mediated introductions is affected by the invasiveness of species and invasibility of ecosystems, but research has primarily focused on defining, characterizing and identifying invasive species; ecosystem invasibility has received much less attention. A prerequisite for characterizing invasibility is the ability to compare levels of invasion across ecosystems. In this paper, we aim to identify the best way to quantify the level of invasion by nonnative animals and plants by reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of different metrics. We explore how interpretation and choice of these measures can depend on the objective of a study or management intervention. Based on our review, we recommend two invasion indices and illustrate their use by applying them to two case studies. Relative alien species richness and relative alien species abundance indicate the contribution that alien species make to a community. They are easy to measure, can be applied to various taxa, are independent of scale and are comparable across regions and ecosystems, and historical data are often available. The relationship between relative alien richness and abundance can indicate the presence of dominant alien species and the trajectory of invasion over time, and can highlight ecosystems and sites that are heavily invaded or especially susceptible to invasion. Splitting species into functional groups and examining invasion patterns of transformer species may be particularly instructive for gauging effects of alien invasion on ecosystem structure and function. Establishing standard, transparent ways to define and quantify invasion level will facilitate meaningful comparisons among studies, ecosystem types and regions. It is essential for progress in ecology and will help guide ecosystem restoration and management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions
Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., & West, C. J. (2000) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x · Cited by 4,058
Self-citationWiens, J. A. (1989) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2389612 · Cited by 3,689
Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility
Davis, M. A., Grime, J. P., & Thompson, K. (2000) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00473.x · Cited by 3,447
Vilà, M., Espinar, J. L., Hejda, M., Hulme, P. E., Jarošík, V., Maron, J. L., Pergl, J., Schaffner, U., Sun, Y., & Pyšek, P. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x · Cited by 3,068
Self-citationA proposed unified framework for biological invasions
Blackburn, T. M., Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Carlton, J. T., Duncan, R. P., Jarošík, V., Wilson, J. R. U., & Richardson, D. M. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023 · Cited by 2,621
Self-citationCommunity ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions
Shea, K. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02495-3 · Cited by 2,271
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Von Holle, B. (1999) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1010086329619 · Cited by 2,231
The Measurement of Species Diversity
Peet, R. K. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001441 · Cited by 2,095
Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order
Hobbs, R. J., Arico, S., Aronson, J., Baron, J. S., Bridgewater, P., Cramer, V. A., Epstein, P. R., Ewel, J. J., Klink, C. A., Lugo, A. E., et al. (2006) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-822x.2006.00212.x · Cited by 2,093
Self-citationNovel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration
Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E., & Harris, J. A. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012 · Cited by 2,008
Cited by
Endemism increases species' climate change risk in areas of global biodiversity importance
Manes, S., Costello, M. J., Beckett, H., Debnath, A., Devenish-Nelson, E., Grey, K.-A., Jenkins, R., Khan, T. M., Kiessling, W., Krause, C., et al. (2021) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109070 · Cited by 373
Buckley, Y. M., & Catford, J. (2016) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12501 · Cited by 163
Self-citationMorri, C., Montefalcone, M., Gatti, G., Vassallo, P., Paoli, C., & Bianchi, C. N. (2019) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d11090146 · Cited by 37
Models of alien species richness show moderate predictive accuracy and poor transferability
Capinha, C., Essl, F., Seebens, H., Pereira, H. M., & Kühn, I. (2018) · NeoBiota · doi:10.3897/neobiota.38.23518 · Cited by 16
“Knowledge about alien species richness is also required by environmental managers and researchers to assist in decision-making of tasks such as ecosystem restoration (Catford et al. 2012), the identification of points of entry for introduced species (e.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Catford, J. A., Vesk, P. A., Richardson, D. M., & Pyšek, P.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-27
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-62
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2127694975
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 13.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02549.x
- The paper
- Catford, J. A., Vesk, P. A., Richardson, D. M., & Pyšek, P. (2012). Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02549.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.