Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,621

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A proposed unified framework for biological invasions

Blackburn, Tim M., Pyšek, Petr, Bacher, Sven, Carlton, James T., Duncan, Richard P., Jarošík, Vojtěch, Wilson, John R.U., Richardson, David M.·2011·Trends in Ecology & Evolution
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Pyšek, 2004, Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists, Taxon, 53, 131, 10.2307/4135498 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Richardson, 2000, Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions, Divers. Distrib., 6, 93, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Duncan, 2003, The ecology of bird introductions, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 34, 71, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132353 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Blackburn, 2001, Establishment patterns of exotic birds are constrained by non-random patterns in introduction, J. Biogeogr., 28, 927, 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00597.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cassey, 2004, Mistakes in the analysis of exotic species establishment: source pool designation and correlates of introduction success among parrots (Psittaciformes) of the world, J. Biogeogr., 31, 277, 10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00979.x · DOI
  6. Pyšek, 2004, Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations, Divers. Distrib., 10, 179, 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00079.x · DOI
  7. Sol, 2008, The comparative analysis of historical alien introductions, Biol. Inv., 7, 1119, 10.1007/s10530-007-9189-7 · DOI
  8. Van Kleunen, 2010, Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness, Ecol. Lett., 13, 947, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01503.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Heger, 2003, Predicting biological invasions, Biol. Inv., 5, 313, 10.1023/B:BINV.0000005568.44154.12 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Richardson, 2004, Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework, Divers. Distrib., 10, 321, 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00096.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Catford, 2009, Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework, Divers. Distrib., 15, 22, 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bomford, 2003, Risk Assessment for the Import and Keeping of Exotic Vertebrates in Australia, Bureau of Rural Sciences
  13. Groves, 2003, Weed Categories for Natural and Agricultural Ecosystem Management, Bureau of Rural Sciences
  14. Pyšek, 2002, Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic, Preslia, 74, 97
  15. Celesti-Grapow, 2009, Inventory of the non-native flora of Italy, Plant Biosyst., 143, 386, 10.1080/11263500902722824 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Williamson, 1996, The varying success of invaders, Ecology, 77, 1661, 10.2307/2265769 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Sakai, 2001, The population biology of invasive species, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 32, 305, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114037 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lodge, 2006, Biological invasions: recommendations for US policy and management, Ecol. Appl., 6, 2035, 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2035:BIRFUP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Colautti, 2004, A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species, Divers. Distrib., 10, 135, 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00061.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ruesink, 2005, Introduction of non-native oysters: ecosystem effects and restoration implications, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 36, 643, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152638 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hulme, 2008, Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy, J. Appl. Ecol., 45, 403, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01442.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. D’Antonio, 2001, Ecosystem resistance to invasion and the role of propagule supply: a California perspective, Int. J. Med. Ecol., 2, 233
  23. Wilson, 2009, Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success, Trends Ecol. Evol., 24, 136, 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.007 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Richardson, 2006, Pinus: a model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions?, Preslia, 78, 375
  25. Short, 2002, Surplus killing by introduced predators in Australia – evidence for ineffective anti-predator adaptations in native prey species?, Biol. Conserv., 103, 283, 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00139-2 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Meffin, 2010, Experimental introduction of the alien plant Hieracium lepidulum reveals no significant impact on montane plant communities in New Zealand, Divers. Distrib., 16, 804, 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00684.x · DOI
  27. Simberloff, 2004, Now you see them, now you don’t! Population crashes of established introduced species, Biol. Inv., 6, 161, 10.1023/B:BINV.0000022133.49752.46 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Richardson, 2011, Learning from our mistakes: minimizing problems with invasive biofuel plants, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sus., 3, 36, 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.11.006 · DOI
  29. Henderson, 2006, Progress in invasive plants research, Prog. Phys. Geog., 30, 25, 10.1191/0309133306pp468ra · DOI
  30. With, 2002, The landscape ecology of invasive spread, Conserv. Biol., 16, 1192, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01064.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Carlton, 1985, Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: the biology of ballast water, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev., 23, 313
  32. Pyšek, 2006, Who cites who in the invasion zoo: insights from an analysis of the most highly cited papers in invasion ecology, Preslia, 78, 437
  33. Pranty, 2001, The budgerigar in Florida: the rise and fall of an exotic psittacid, N. Am. Birds, 55, 389
  34. Heard, 2004, Agents for biological control of Mimosa pigra in Australia: review and future prospects, 126
  35. Ostermeyer, 2007, Establishment, distribution and abundance of Mimosa pigra biological control agents in northern Australia: implications for biological control, Biocontrol, 52, 703, 10.1007/s10526-006-9054-0 · doi:10.1007/s10526-006-9054-0
  36. Paynter, 2005, Evaluating the impact of a biological control agent Carmenta mimosa on the woody wetland weed Mimosa pigra in Australia, J. Appl. Ecol., 42, 1054, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01105.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01105.x

Cited by

See all 2,621

Metadata

Authors
Blackburn, T. M., Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Carlton, J. T., Duncan, R. P., Jarošík, V., Wilson, J. R. U., & Richardson, D. M.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
333-339
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
OpenAlex
W2162911488
Cited by
2,621
References
3
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
The paper
Blackburn, T. M., Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Carlton, J. T., Duncan, R. P., Jarošík, V., Wilson, J. R. U., & Richardson, D. M. (2011). A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.