The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the forest cover–water yield debate: from demand‐ to supply‐side thinking
Open accessAbstract
Several major articles from the past decade and beyond conclude the impact of reforestation or afforestation on water yield is negative: additional forest cover will reduce and removing forests will raise downstream water availability. A second group of authors argue the opposite: planting additional forests should raise downstream water availability and intensify the hydrologic cycle. Obtaining supporting evidence for this second group of authors has been more difficult due to the larger scales at which the positive effects of forests on the water cycle may be seen. We argue that forest cover is inextricably linked to precipitation. Forest‐driven evapotranspiration removed from a particular catchment contributes to the availability of atmospheric moisture vapor and its cross‐continental transport, raising the likelihood of precipitation events and increasing water yield, in particular in continental interiors more distant from oceans. Seasonal relationships heighten the importance of this phenomenon. We review the arguments from different scales and perspectives. This clarifies the generally beneficial relationship between forest cover and the intensity of the hydrologic cycle. While evidence supports both sides of the argument – trees can reduce runoff at the small catchment scale – at larger scales, trees are more clearly linked to increased precipitation and water availability. Progressive deforestation, land conversion from forest to agriculture and urbanization have potentially negative consequences for global precipitation, prompting us to think of forest ecosystems as global public goods. Policy‐making attempts to measure product water footprints, estimate the value of ecosystem services, promote afforestation, develop drought mitigation strategies and otherwise manage land use must consider the linkage of forests to the supply of precipitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global hydrological cycles and world water resources
Oki, T., & Kanae, S. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128845 · Cited by 4,392
Drought under global warming: a review
Dai, A. (2011) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.81 · Cited by 3,523 · cited 1×
“Dai (2010), for example, neglects potential connections between forest cover and drought potential.”
BackgroundThe Changing Character of Precipitation
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M., & Parsons, D. B. (2003) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-84-9-1205 · Cited by 3,196
Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale
Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., & Walker, G. R. (2001) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2000wr900325 · Cited by 2,571
Bosch, J. M., & Hewlett, J. D. (1982) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2 · Cited by 2,567
Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s
Gibbs, H. K., Ruesch, A. S., Achard, F., Clayton, M. K., Holmgren, P., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0910275107 · Cited by 1,876
Brown, A. E., Zhang, L., McMahon, T. A., Western, A. W., & Vertessy, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.010 · Cited by 1,587
Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees?
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2004) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.015 · Cited by 1,454
Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century
DeFries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M., & Hansen, M. (2010) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo756 · Cited by 1,413
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations
BUCKLEY, R. (2011) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02253.x · Cited by 1,384
Cited by
Trees, forests and water: cool insights for a hot world
Ellison, D., Morris, C. E., Locatelli, B., Sheil, D., Cohen, J., Murdiyarso, D., Gutierrez, V., Noordwijk, M. V., Creed, I. F., Pokorny, J., et al. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.002 · Cited by 1,249
Self-citationA global map of roadless areas and their conservation status
Ibisch, P. L., Hoffmann, M. T., Kreft, S., Pe’er, G., Kati, V., Biber-Freudenberger, L., DellaSala, D. A., Vale, M. M., Hobson, P. R., & Selva, N. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf7166 · Cited by 623
Human domination of the global water cycle absent from depictions and perceptions
Abbott, B. W., Bishop, K., Zarnetske, J. P., Minaudo, C., Chapin, F. S., Krause, S., Hannah, D. M., Conner, L., Ellison, D., Godsey, S. E., et al. (2019) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0374-y · Cited by 532
Self-citationA review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system
Dislich, C., Keyel, A. C., Salecker, J., Kisel, Y., Meyer, K. M., Auliya, M., Barnes, A. D., Corre, M. D., Darras, K., Faust, H., et al. (2017) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12295 · Cited by 373
Shifts in regional water availability due to global tree restoration
Hoek van Dijke, A. J., Herold, M., Mallick, K., Benedict, I., Machwitz, M., Schlerf, M., Pranindita, A., Theeuwen, J. J. E., Bastin, J.-F., & Teuling, A. J. (2022) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-022-00935-0 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellison, D., N. Futter, M., & Bishop, K.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 806-820
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2038547406
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 19.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the forest cover–water yield debate: from demand‐ to supply‐side thinking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02589.x
- The paper
- Ellison, D., N. Futter, M., & Bishop, K. (2012). On the forest cover–water yield debate: from demand‐ to supply‐side thinking. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02589.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
