Cited by 7Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

The effect of oxygen concentration on changes in the microbial population, temperature and dry matter content in grass silage

WILLIAMS, A. G., LOWE, J. F., REES, D. V. H.·1994·Grass and Forage Science

Abstract

The effects of transfusing cores of grass silage with mixtures of oxygen and nitrogen containing 0%, 0·2%, 2%, 5% and 20% oxygen were investigated. Changes in populations of yeasts, lactobacilli and streptococci were measured and the relationship between populations after 7 days' transfusion and oxygen concentration were tested against the predictions of two models, based on Monod and logistic growth functions. Yeasts were related to oxygen by the Monod model, while lactobacilli and streptococci were related by the logistic model. The differences were ascribed to yeasts initiating deterioration by growing aerobically, while lactobacilli and streptococci grew fermentatively once the environment had changed following yeast growth. Dry‐matter losses were related to oxygen by the Monod model. Changes in temperature were related to dry matter loss (through measurements of CO 2 evolution) using a simple heat balance model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb01991.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase in temperature is a convenient indicator of the extent and intensity of aerobic deterioration in both experimental and practical conditions.

    “Because the oxidation process is accompanied by the evolution of heat, an increase in temperature is a convenient indicator of the extent and intensity of aerobic deterioration in both experimental and practical conditions (Honig and Woolford, 1980; Williams et al., 1994)”

    From Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages (2018) · cites this paper as Williams et al., 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILLIAMS, A. G., LOWE, J. F., & REES, D. V. H.
Affiliations
  • Silsoe Research Institute (GB)
  • Scottish Agricultural College (GB)
Corresponding author
WILLIAMS, A. G.
Venue
Grass and Forage Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
183-191
ISSN
  • 0142-5242 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2494
OpenAlex
W1968670661
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Grass and Forage Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
grass silage, oxygen concentration, yeast growth, lactobacilli, Streptococcus, Monod kinetics, logistic growth model, dry matter loss, silage temperature, CO2 evolution, heat balance model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review