The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up
Abstract
The invasion of vascular spaces (lymphatic and/or blood vessel) by tumour, as assessed on routine haematoxylin and eosin sections, was investigated in a consecutive series of 1704 women with primary operable invasive breast carcinoma. Strict morphological criteria were used. Patients were under 70 years of age and received definitive surgery with no adjuvant systemic therapies. Information from regular follow‐up (range 3–17 years) was recorded on to a computer database. Definite vascular invasion was seen in 22.8% of cases and concurrence between pathologists was high. In univariate analyses, vascular invasion was strongly associated with lymph node stage (P≤ 0.0001), tumour size (P≤ 0.0001), histological grade (P≤ 0.0001) and type of tumour (P≤ 0.0001). In multivariate analyses vascular invasion was of independent prognostic significance for both survival and for local recurrence of tumour; patients with tumours showing no vascular invasion had a significant survival advantage and a reduced risk of local recurrence. No association with oestrogen receptor status or menopause status was seen. The results confirm that histological assessment of vascular invasion provides independent prognostic information in primary operable breast carcinoma which may be helpful in making clinical decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models
Weigelt, B., Peterse, J. L., & van't Veer, L. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1670 · Cited by 2,232
Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+Lymphocytes Predict Clinical Outcome in Breast Cancer
Mahmoud, S. M. A., Paish, E. C., Powe, D. G., Macmillan, R. D., Grainge, M. J., Lee, A. H. S., Ellis, I. O., & Green, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.30.5037 · Cited by 1,367
Self-citationPrognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999
Fitzgibbons, P. L., Page, D. L., Weaver, D., Thor, A. D., Allred, D. C., Clark, G. M., Ruby, S. G., O'Malley, F., Simpson, J. F., Connolly, J. L., et al. (2000) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2000-124-0966-pfibc · Cited by 1,016
Rakha, E., Putti, T., Abd El‐Rehim, D., Paish, C., Green, A., Powe, D., Lee, A., Robertson, J., & Ellis, I. (2006) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.1916 · Cited by 311
Self-citationProtocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast
Lester, S. C., Bose, S., Chen, Y.-Y., Connolly, J. L., de Baca, M. E., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Hayes, D. F., Kleer, C., O'Malley, F. P., Page, D. L., et al. (2009) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/133.10.1515 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- PINDER, S. E., ELLIS, I. O., GALEA, M., O'ROUKE, S., BLAMEY, R. W., & ELSTON, C. W.
- Venue
- Histopathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-47
- ISSN
- 0309-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2559
- OpenAlex
- W1986657548
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1994.tb01269.x
- The paper
- PINDER, S. E., ELLIS, I. O., GALEA, M., O'ROUKE, S., BLAMEY, R. W., & ELSTON, C. W. (1994). Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1994.tb01269.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.