The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast
Abstract
The College of American Pathologists offers these protocols to assist pathologists in providing clinically useful and relevant information when reporting results of surgical specimen examinations. The College regards the reporting elements in the “Surgical Pathology Cancer Case Summary (Checklist)” portion of the protocols as essential elements of the pathology report. However, the manner in which these elements are reported is at the discretion of each specific pathologist, taking into account clinician preferences, institutional policies, and individual practice.The College developed these protocols as an educational tool to assist pathologists in the useful reporting of relevant information. It did not issue the protocols for use in litigation, reimbursement, or other contexts. Nevertheless, the College recognizes that the protocols might be used by hospitals, attorneys, payers, and others. Indeed, effective January 1, 2004, the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons mandated the use of the checklist elements of the protocols as part of its Cancer Program Standards for Approved Cancer Programs. Therefore, it becomes even more important for pathologists to familiarize themselves with these documents. At the same time, the College cautions that use of the protocols other than for their intended educational purpose may involve additional considerations that are beyond the scope of this document.This protocol applies to all invasive carcinomas of the breast, including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with microinvasion. The 7th edition TNM staging system for carcinoma of the breast of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) is recommended.Select a Single Response Unless Otherwise Indicated.* Data elements with asterisks are not required. However, these elements may be clinically important but are not yet validated or regularly used in patient management.Specimen (note A)__ Partial breast__ Total breast (including nipple and skin)__ Other (specify): ______ Not specifiedProcedure (note A)__ Excision without wire-guided localization__ Excision with wire-guided localization__ Total mastectomy (including nipple and skin)__ Other (specify): ______ Not specifiedLymph Node Sampling (select all that apply) (note B)__ No lymph nodes present__ Sentinel lymph node(s)__ Axillary dissection (partial or complete dissection)__ Lymph nodes present within the breast specimen (ie, intramammary lymph nodes)__ Other lymph nodes (eg, supraclavicular or location not identified) Specify location, if provided: ____Specimen Integrity (note C)__ Single intact specimen (margins can be evaluated)__ Multiple designated specimens (eg, main excision and identified margins)__ Fragmented (margins cannot be evaluated with certainty)__ Other (specify): ____Specimen Size (for excisions less than total mastectomy) (note C)Greatest dimension: __ cm* Additional dimensions: __ × __ cm__ Cannot be determinedSpecimen Laterality__ Right__ Left__ Not specified*Tumor Site: Invasive Carcinoma (select all that apply) (note D)*__ Upper outer quadrant*__ Lower outer quadrant*__ Upper inner quadrant*__ Lower inner quadrant*__ Central*__ Nipple* Position: __ o'clock* Other (specify): ____*__ Not specifiedTumor Size: Size of Largest Invasive Carcinoma (note E)__ Microinvasion only (≤0.1 cm)Greatest dimension of largest focus of invasion greater than 0.1 cm: __ cm* Additional dimensions: __ × __ cm__ No residual invasive carcinoma after presurgical (neoadjuvant) therapy__ Cannot be determined (see Comment)Note: The size of the invasive carcinoma should take into consideration the gross findings correlated with the microscopic examination. In some cases, it may be helpful to use information about tumor size of invasion are the size is the size of the largest of The size of invasive carcinomas should not be The size not a or a of invasion than in the the largest dimension of the invasive carcinoma in the specimen should be used for if and invasive carcinoma is the is as if is residual and if is (note Single focus of invasive Multiple of invasive carcinoma of __ of individual ______ No residual invasive carcinoma after presurgical (neoadjuvant) therapy__ are invasive and the results of for and should to the largest invasive invasive carcinomas in of these this information may be in the and of (select all that apply) (note is not present__ Invasive carcinoma not into the or Invasive carcinoma into the or without Invasive carcinoma into the or with as of invasive carcinoma are present (ie, not with the invasive carcinoma in the as not involve the nipple nipple of the not the No present__ is present and is of Carcinoma Carcinoma into and into the as into is not and are not as is invasion than this Carcinoma In (note No is present__ is present __ __ __ is present after presurgical (neoadjuvant) of size of dimension by gross and microscopic is at __ cm* Additional dimensions: __ × __ cm* of with o
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
Wolff, A. C., Hammond, M. E. H., Schwartz, J. N., Hagerty, K. L., Allred, D. C., Cote, R. J., Dowsett, M., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Hanna, W. M., Langer, A., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.2775 · Cited by 4,434
Self-citationHammond, M. E. H., Hayes, D. F., Dowsett, M., Allred, D. C., Hagerty, K. L., Badve, S., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Francis, G., Goldstein, N. S., Hayes, M., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.6529 · Cited by 4,213
Self-citationPathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs
Tavassoli, F. A., & Devilee, P. (2003) · International Agency for Research on Cancer eBooks · Cited by 2,800
AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed
Greene, F., Page, D., Id, F., Fritz, J., Balch, C., & Haller, D. (2002) · Cited by 2,324
Self-citationHarris, L., Fritsche, H., Mennel, R., Norton, L., Ravdin, P., Taube, S., Somerfield, M. R., Hayes, D. F., & Bast, R. C. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.2364 · Cited by 2,217
Self-citationHarvey, J. M., Clark, G. M., Osborne, C. K., & Allred, D. C. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.5.1474 · Cited by 2,056
Wolff, A. C., Hammond, M. E. H., Schwartz, J. N., Hagerty, K. L., Allred, D. C., Cote, R. J., Dowsett, M., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Hanna, W. M., Langer, A., et al. (2007) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2007-131-18-asocco · Cited by 1,816
Self-citationHaagenson, C. (1971) · Cited by 1,773
Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer
Elston, C. (1999) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/s1040-8428(99)00034-7 · Cited by 1,735
Cited by
Steiner, D. F., MacDonald, R., Liu, Y., Truszkowski, P., Hipp, J. D., Gammage, C., Thng, F., Peng, L., & Stumpe, M. C. (2018) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000001151 · Cited by 489
A population-level digital histologic biomarker for enhanced prognosis of invasive breast cancer
Amgad, M., Hodge, J. M., Elsebaie, M. A. T., Bodelon, C., Puvanesarajah, S., Gutman, D. A., Siziopikou, K. P., Goldstein, J. A., Gaudet, M. M., Teras, L. R., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02643-7 · Cited by 137
Challa, B., Tahir, M., Hu, Y., Kellough, D., Lujan, G., Sun, S., Parwani, A. V., & Li, Z. (2023) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100216 · Cited by 61
The INTEGRATE project: delivering solutions for efficient multi-centric clinical research and trials
Kondylakis, H., Claerhout, B., Keyur, M., Koumakis, L., van Leeuwen, J., Marias, K., Perez-Rey, D., De Schepper, K., Tsiknakis, M., & Bucur, A. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.05.006 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Lester, S. C., Bose, S., Chen, Y.-Y., Connolly, J. L., de Baca, M. E., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Hayes, D. F., Kleer, C., O'Malley, F. P., Page, D. L., Smith, B. L., Tan, L. K., Weaver, D. L., & Winer, E.
- Venue
- Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1515-1538
- ISSN
- 0003-9985 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2165
- OpenAlex
- W1771499318
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5858/133.10.1515
- The paper
- Lester, S. C., Bose, S., Chen, Y.-Y., Connolly, J. L., de Baca, M. E., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Hayes, D. F., Kleer, C., O'Malley, F. P., Page, D. L., Smith, B. L., Tan, L. K., Weaver, D. L., & Winer, E. (2009). Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.5858/133.10.1515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.