Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The adjuvant mechanism of cationic dimethyldioctadecylammonium liposomes

Open access
Smith Korsholm, Karen, Agger, Else Marie, Foged, Camilla, Christensen, Dennis, Dietrich, Jes, Andersen, Claire Swetman, Geisler, Carsten, Andersen, Peter·2007·Immunology

Abstract

Summary: Cationic liposomes are being used increasingly as efficient adjuvants for subunit vaccines but their precise mechanism of action is still unknown. Here, we investigated the adjuvant mechanism of cationic liposomes based on the synthetic amphiphile dimethyldioctadecylammonium (DDA). The liposomes did not have an effect on the maturation of murine bone‐marrow‐derived dendritic cells (BM‐DCs) related to the surface expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, CD40, CD80 and CD86. We found that ovalbumin (OVA) readily associated with the liposomes (> 90%) when mixed in equal concentrations. This efficient adsorption onto the liposomes led to an enhanced uptake of OVA by BM‐DCs as assessed by flow cytometry and confocal fluorescence laser‐scanning microscopy. This was an active process, which was arrested at 4° and by an inhibitor of actin‐dependent endocytosis, cytochalasin D. In vivo studies confirmed the observed effect because adsorption of OVA onto DDA liposomes enhanced the uptake of the antigen by peritoneal exudate cells after intraperitoneal injection. The liposomes targeted antigen preferentially to antigen‐presenting cells because we only observed a minimal uptake by T cells in mixed splenocyte cultures. The adsorption of antigen onto the liposomes increased the efficiency of antigen presentation more than 100 times in a responder assay with MHC class II‐restricted OVA‐specific T‐cell receptor transgenic DO11.10 T cells. Our data therefore suggest that the primary adjuvant mechanism of cationic DDA liposomes is to target the cell membrane of antigen‐presenting cells, which subsequently leads to enhanced uptake and presentation of antigen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02560.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Smith Korsholm, K., Agger, E. M., Foged, C., Christensen, D., Dietrich, J., Andersen, C. S., Geisler, C., & Andersen, P.
Venue
Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-14
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
216-226
ISSN
  • 0019-2805 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2567
OpenAlex
W2004687635
Cited by
187
References
0
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The adjuvant mechanism of cationic dimethyldioctadecylammonium liposomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02560.x
The paper
Smith Korsholm, K., Agger, E. M., Foged, C., Christensen, D., Dietrich, J., Andersen, C. S., Geisler, C., & Andersen, P. (2007). The adjuvant mechanism of cationic dimethyldioctadecylammonium liposomes. Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02560.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.