The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level*
Abstract
Abstract.This paper explores the effect of managerial innovativeness in municipal government on the adoption of e‐government, and it examines the association between the adoption of e‐government and its outcome. The authors posit an exploratory model: The first part of the model shows how adoption of municipal e‐government is determined by managerial innovativeness orientation, government capacity and institutional characteristics such as city size and government type. The second part suggests how e‐government outcomes are associated with the adoption of e‐government, government capacity and institutional characteristics. Analysing two different survey data sets of American municipal reinvention and e‐government, this study finds that managerial innovativeness orientation and city size are the most compelling determinants of municipal e‐government adoption. Different levels of e‐government adoption may yield different outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., Hu, P. J.-H., & Brown, S. A. (2011) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00373.x · Cited by 852
e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels
Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006 · Cited by 581
Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments
Pittaway, J. J., & Montazemi, A. R. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101474 · Cited by 289
Internet, trust in government, and citizen compliance
Im, T., Cho, W., Porumbescu, G., & Park, J. (2014) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mus037 · Cited by 245
Does E-Government Raise Effectiveness and Efficiency?: Examining the Cross-National Effect
Nam, T. (2019) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2019070107 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Moon, M. J., & Norris, D. F.
- Venue
- Information Systems Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-60
- ISSN
- 1350-1917 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2575
- OpenAlex
- W2068098306
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 75.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
