The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome annotation and comparative analyses of the odorant‐binding proteins and chemosensory proteins in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum
Open accessAbstract
Odorant‐binding proteins (OBPs) and chemosensory proteins (CSPs) are two families of small water‐soluble proteins, abundant in the aqueous fluid surrounding olfactory receptor neurons in insect antennae. OBPs are involved in the first step of olfactory signal transduction, carrying airborne semiochemicals to the odorant receptors and can be classified into three groups: Classic OBPs, Plus‐C OBPs and Atypical OBPs. Here, we identified and annotated genes encoding putative OBPs and CSPs in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum using bioinformatics. This identified genes encoding 13 Classic and two Plus‐C OBPs and 13 CSPs. Homologous OBP sequences were also identified in nine other aphid species, allowing us to compare OBPs across several aphid and non‐aphid species. We show that, although OBP sequences are divergent within a species and between different orders, there is a high similarity between orthologs within a range of aphid species. Furthermore, the phylogenetic relationships between OBP orthologs reflect the divergence of aphid evolution lineages. Our results support the ‘birth‐and‐death’ model as the major mechanism explaining aphid OBP sequence evolution, with the main force acting on the evolution being purifying selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Whelan, S., & Goldman, N. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851 · Cited by 2,849
Comparative Genome and Proteome Analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster
Zdobnov, E. M., von Mering, C., Letunic, I., Torrents, D., Suyama, M., Copley, R. R., Christophides, G. K., Thomasova, D., Holt, R. A., Subramanian, G. M., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077061 · Cited by 553
Cited by
Genome Sequence of the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum
The International Aphid Genomics Consortium (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000313 · Cited by 1,314
Vieira, F. G., & Rozas, J. (2011) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evr033 · Cited by 502
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, J. ‐., Vieira, F. G., He, X. ‐., Smadja, C., Liu, R., Rozas, J., & Field, L. M.
- Venue
- Insect Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-23
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- s2
- Pages
- 113-122
- ISSN
- 0962-1075 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2583
- OpenAlex
- W1919906216
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome annotation and comparative analyses of the odorant‐binding proteins and chemosensory proteins in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00919.x
- The paper
- Zhou, J. ‐., Vieira, F. G., He, X. ‐., Smadja, C., Liu, R., Rozas, J., & Field, L. M. (2010). Genome annotation and comparative analyses of the odorant‐binding proteins and chemosensory proteins in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insect Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00919.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.