The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of and factors affecting post‐obturation pain in patients undergoing root canal treatment
Abstract
Aim This longitudinal, prospective study (1) investigated the prevalence of post‐obturation pain after root canal treatment and (2) evaluated the influence of factors affecting the pain experience. Methodology Twenty practitioners, comprising general dental practitioners, MSc graduates and Endodontists, participated in this study. The patient sample (n = 415) was derived from consecutive patients attending the practitioners’ surgeries for root canal treatment on a single tooth. Demographic, medical history, preoperative and intra‐operative data as well as pain experience on day 1 and day 2 after root canal obturation were recorded. Intensity of pain experienced was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0–5. The data were analysed using logistic regression models. Results The prevalence of post‐obturation pain within 48 h after treatment was 40.2% (n = 167) but less than 12% of patients experienced severe pain (VAS 4 or 5) on either day 1 or day 2. The factors that significantly influenced post‐obturation pain experience were: gender (OR = 0.434, P < 0.001), tooth type (OR = 1.733, P = 0.007), size of periapical lesion (OR = 0.493, P = 0.004), history of post‐preparation pain (OR = 4.110, P = <0.001) or generalized swelling (OR = 3.435, P = 0.005) and number of treatment visits (OR = 2.604, P < 0.001). Conclusions The prevalence of post‐obturation pain was high (40.2%). The important prognostic determinants of post‐obturation pain were female, molar tooth, size of periapical lesion smaller than 3 mm, history of post‐preparation pain or generalized swelling and single‐visit treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender variations in clinical pain experience
Unruh, A. M. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(95)00214-6 · Cited by 1,550
Berkley, K. J. (1997) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x97221485 · Cited by 1,125
Cited by
Pain Prevalence and Severity before, during, and after Root Canal Treatment: A Systematic Review
Pak, J. G., & White, S. N. (2011) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.016 · Cited by 507
Sathorn, C., Parashos, P., & Messer, H. (2008) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01316.x · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Ng, Y. ‐., Glennon, J. P., Setchell, D. J., & Gulabivala, K.
- Venue
- International Endodontic Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-25
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 381-391
- ISSN
- 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2591
- OpenAlex
- W2098470278
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of and factors affecting post‐obturation pain in patients undergoing root canal treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00820.x
- The paper
- Ng, Y. ‐., Glennon, J. P., Setchell, D. J., & Gulabivala, K. (2004). Prevalence of and factors affecting post‐obturation pain in patients undergoing root canal treatment. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00820.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.