Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of and factors affecting post‐obturation pain in patients undergoing root canal treatment

Ng, Y.‐L., Glennon, J. P., Setchell, D. J., Gulabivala, K.·2004·International Endodontic Journal

Abstract

Aim This longitudinal, prospective study (1) investigated the prevalence of post‐obturation pain after root canal treatment and (2) evaluated the influence of factors affecting the pain experience. Methodology Twenty practitioners, comprising general dental practitioners, MSc graduates and Endodontists, participated in this study. The patient sample (n = 415) was derived from consecutive patients attending the practitioners’ surgeries for root canal treatment on a single tooth. Demographic, medical history, preoperative and intra‐operative data as well as pain experience on day 1 and day 2 after root canal obturation were recorded. Intensity of pain experienced was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0–5. The data were analysed using logistic regression models. Results The prevalence of post‐obturation pain within 48 h after treatment was 40.2% (n = 167) but less than 12% of patients experienced severe pain (VAS 4 or 5) on either day 1 or day 2. The factors that significantly influenced post‐obturation pain experience were: gender (OR = 0.434, P < 0.001), tooth type (OR = 1.733, P = 0.007), size of periapical lesion (OR = 0.493, P = 0.004), history of post‐preparation pain (OR = 4.110, P = <0.001) or generalized swelling (OR = 3.435, P = 0.005) and number of treatment visits (OR = 2.604, P < 0.001). Conclusions The prevalence of post‐obturation pain was high (40.2%). The important prognostic determinants of post‐obturation pain were female, molar tooth, size of periapical lesion smaller than 3 mm, history of post‐preparation pain or generalized swelling and single‐visit treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00820.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Ng, Y. ‐., Glennon, J. P., Setchell, D. J., & Gulabivala, K.
Venue
International Endodontic Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-25
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
381-391
ISSN
  • 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2591
OpenAlex
W2098470278
Cited by
252
References
2
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of and factors affecting post‐obturation pain in patients undergoing root canal treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00820.x
The paper
Ng, Y. ‐., Glennon, J. P., Setchell, D. J., & Gulabivala, K. (2004). Prevalence of and factors affecting post‐obturation pain in patients undergoing root canal treatment. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00820.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.