Cited by 981Food and Agricultural SciencesProteins in Food SystemsProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides

A MULTIENZYME TECHNIQUE FOR ESTIMATING PROTEIN DIGESTIBILITY

HSU, H. W., VAVAK, D. L., SATTERLEE, L. D., MILLER, G. A.·1977·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

An in vitro method using a multienzyme system for the estimation of protein digestibility has been developed. The multienzyme system consists of trypsin, chymotrypsin and peptidase. It was found that the pH of a protein suspension immediately after 10 min digestion with the multienzyme solution was highly correlated with the in vivo apparent digestibility of rats. Regression analyses of 23 samples tested showed that the correlation coefficient between pH at 10 min and in vivo apparent digestibility was 0.90 with a standard error of estimate of 2.23. The regression equation was Y = 210.464 ‐ 18.103, where “X” was the pH of protein suspension immediately after the 10 min digestion with the multienzyme solution. The most significant advantage of this in vitro method for predicting apparent protein digestibility was that it can be completed within 1 hr and with a high degree sensitivity. The method can detect the effects of trypsin inhibitor, chlorogenic acid, and heat treatment on protein digestibility. Strong buffer salts may affect the measurement of protein digestibility, but the buffering effects found in general food proteins and products tested did not create any problem with the procedure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1977.tb14476.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pH of a protein suspension immediately after 10 min digestion with the multienzyme solution at 37°C, or after an additional 10 min incubation with microbial protease at 55°C, was highly correlated with the in vivo apparent faecal digestibility of rats (0.90 with standard error of estimate 2.23 for the first study).

    “The pH of a protein suspension immediately after 10 min digestion with the multienzyme solution at 378C (55) , or after an additional l0 min incubation with microbial protease at 558C (56) was highly correlated with the in vivo apparent faecal digestibility of rats (0•90 with a standard error of estimate of 2•23 for the first study).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HSU, H. W., VAVAK, D. L., SATTERLEE, L. D., & MILLER, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-09
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
1269-1273
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W2039285085
Cited by
981
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 43
FWCI
20.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Keywords
protein digestibility, in vitro digestibility, trypsin, chymotrypsin, proteolytic enzymes, apparent digestibility, trypsin inhibitor, chlorogenic acid, heat treatment (food and biological processing), buffer salts, food proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review