Cited by 146Seed and Plant BiochemistryFood composition and propertiesFood and Agricultural Sciences

Nutritional and Functional Properties of Gluten-Free Flours

Open access
Culetu, Alina, Susman, Iulia Elena, Duta, Denisa Eglantina, Belc, Nastasia·2021·Applied Sciences

Abstract

This study characterized and compared 13 gluten-free (GF) flours (rice, brown rice, maize, oat, millet, teff, amaranth, buckwheat, quinoa, chickpea, gram, tiger nut, and plantain) for their nutritional and functional properties. For all GF flours investigated, starch was the major component, except for gram, chickpea, and tiger nut flours with lower starch content (<45%), but higher fiber content (8.8–35.4%). The higher amount of calcium, magnesium, zinc, potassium, phosphorus, similar values for iron and lower content of sodium in gram, makes this flour a good alternative to chickpea or other GF flour to develop healthier food products. Amaranth flour had a high protein digestibility, while tiger nut and millet flours were less digestible. Gram, chickpea, quinoa, buckwheat, and oat flours fulfilled amino acids recommendation for daily adult intake showing no limiting amino acid. Total polyphenolic content and antioxidant capacity showed higher values for buckwheat, followed by quinoa and maize flours. Gram, chickpea, maize, and quinoa flours are good candidates to improve health conditions due to lower saturated fatty acid content. The findings of this study provide useful insights into GF flours and may contribute to the development of novel gluten-free products like bread, cookies, or pasta.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app11146283

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies combining rice flour with legume flours, such as chickpea flour, have demonstrated improved emulsifying properties and enhanced dough development.

    “Studies combining rice flour with legume flours, such as chickpea flour, have demonstrated improved emulsifying properties and enhanced dough development [44,106,112,113].”

    From Valorization of Microalgae as Multifunctional Protein Sources in Plant-Based Systems: Structural, Functional, and Processing Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [112]

    The Introduction reports that chickpea has good emulsifying properties and can improve gluten-free bread volume. It describes a chickpea–tiger nut flour combination, not a rice–chickpea combination; the cited passages do not report enhanced dough development. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition: Report of an FAO expert consultation. FAO Food Nutr. Pap. 2013, 92, 1-66.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Culetu, A., Susman, I. E., Duta, D. E., & Belc, N.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Research & Development for Food Bioresources, IBA Bucharest, 6 Dinu Vintila Street, 021102 Bucharest, Romania
  • National Research & Development Institute for Food Bioresources ‒ IBA Bucharest (RO)
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-07-07
Volume
11
Issue
14
Pages
6283
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3182344927
Cited by
146
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Research,Innovation and Digitalization (project number 19 02 02 02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
gluten-free flour, nutritional properties, functional properties, starch content, dietary fiber, mineral content, protein digestibility, amino acid composition, polyphenols, antioxidant capacity, saturated fatty acids, amaranth flour, quinoa flour, buckwheat flour, chickpea flour, tiger nut flour, rice flour, corn flour, oat flour, millet flour

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review