The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studies on Desi and Kabuli Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cultivars. The Levels of Amylase Inhibitors, Levels of Oligosaccharides and In Vitro Starch Digestibility
Abstract
Amylase inhibitor activity (AIA) of chickpea extracts was investigated using pancreatic and salivary amylases. The extracts showed higher inhibitor activity towards pancreatic amylase than salivary amylase. Mean values indicated slightly higher inhibitory activity in desi than kabuli cultivars, though clear‐cut differences were not observed among the cultivars. While in vitro starch digestibility of meal samples indicated no large differences among desi and kabuli types of chickpea, the mean values of digestibility of isolated starches of kabuli types was higher than those of desi types. The mean values of stachyose were higher in desi cultivars. When desi and kabuli types were considered together, stachyose and raffinose contents were not found significantly related to the concentrations of total soluble sugars while stachyose showed a significant correlation with raffinose.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Proteinaceous enzyme inhibitors and polyphenolic compounds limit starch digestion.
“Proteinaceous enzyme inhibitors (e.g., albumin and gliadin inhibitors) and a range of polyphenolic compounds have been shown to limit starch digestion (Rehman, 2005; Wűrsch et al., 1986; Singh et al., 1982).”
From Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health (2017) · cites this paper as Singh et al., 1982
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1021/ac60111a017 · DOI · Paper page
- Garwood D.L., 1976, Starches of endosperms possessing different alleles at the amylose extender of locus in Zea mays L, Cereal Chem., 53, 355
- 10.1111/j.1745-4514.1978.tb00607.x · DOI
- Granum P.E., 1981, Nutritional significance of α‐amylase inhibitors from wheat, Nut. Rep. Int., 23, 156
- Hellendoorn E.W., 1969, Intestinal effects following ingestion of beans, Food Technol., 23, 87
- Hernandex A., 1968, Inhibitor de la amilasa pancreatica en caraotas (Phaseolus vulgaris), Acta cient Venez., 19, 183
- 10.1093/jn/94.2.203 · DOI
- Jaffe W.G., 1973, Amylase inhibitors in legume seeds, Nutr. Rep. Int., 7, 169
- Leslie H., 1968, Analysis of mixtures of sugars by paper and cellulose column chromatography, Methods Biochem. Anal., 1, 205
- Lineback D.R., 1975, Starches and low molecular weight carbohydrates from chickpea and horse bean flours, Cereal Chem., 52, 334
- 10.1139/o61-205 · DOI
- Shurpalaker K.S. Sundaravalli O.E. andDesazi B.L.M.1973.Effect of cooking and germination on the flatus inducing capacity of some legumes. In “Nutritional Aspects of Common Beans and Other Legume Seeds as Animal and Human Foods.” Proceedings of a meeting held in Ribeireio Preto S.P. Brazil November 6–9 1973.
- 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb04176.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0031-9422(80)80162-2 · DOI
- Srinivasa Rao P., 1969, Studies on the digestibility of carbohydrates in pulses, Indian J. Med. Res., 57, 2151
- Steggerda F.R., 1967, Is the oligosaccharide fraction in soybean product responsible for flatulence. Paper No. 21. Abstracts of Papers, 52nd Annual Meeting, American Association of Cereal Chemists, April 2–6, Cereal Science Today, 12, 103
- 10.1021/jf60216a044 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health
Lovegrove, A., Edwards, C. H., De Noni, I., Patel, H., El, S. N., Grassby, T., Zielke, C., Ulmius, M., Nilsson, L., Butterworth, P. J., et al. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2014.939263 · Cited by 606
“Proteinaceous enzyme inhibitors (e.g., albumin and gliadin inhibitors) and a range of polyphenolic compounds have been shown to limit starch digestion (Rehman, 2005; Wu rsch et al., 1986; Singh et al., 1982).”
BackgroundUppal, V., & Bains, K. (2012) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0273-8 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- SINGH, U., KHERDEKAR, M. S., & JAMBUNATHAN, R.
- Affiliations
- International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (IN)
- ORCID
- SINGH, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 510-512
- ISSN
- 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-3841
- OpenAlex
- W2171066735
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
- Keywords
- chickpea, desi chickpea, kabuli chickpea, amylase inhibitors, starch digestibility, oligosaccharides, stachyose, raffinose, soluble sugars, pancreatic amylase, salivary amylase, cultivar differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
