Cited by 118Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Volatile Compounds from Raspberry and Strawberry Fruit Inhibit Postharvest Decay Fungi

VAUGHN, S. F., SPENCER, G. F., SHASHA, B. S.·1993·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

Fifteen volatiles released by red raspberries and strawberries during ripening were analyzed for the inhibition of postharvest decay fungi. Five compounds completely inhibited all fungi directly on fruit at 0.4 μL/mL., Of these, benzaldehyde at 0.04 μL/mL completely inhibited isolated cultures of Alternaria altemata, Botrytis cinerea , and Col‐Ietotrichum gloeosporioides , while 1‐hexanol, E ‐2‐hexenal and 2‐non‐anone inhibited all three fungal species at 0.1 μL/mL. When added directly to media, 0.1% (v/v) benzaldehyde or E ‐2‐hexenal inhibited all three species. Starch encapsulated 2‐nonanone reduced fungal decay of raspberries and strawberries in enclosed containers after 7 days at 10°C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb09360.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Raspberry and strawberry fruit volatile compounds are effective against post harvest decay fungi.

    “| Raspberry ( Rubus spp.) and Strawberry ( Fragaria spp.) | Fruit | Volatile compounds | Post harvest decay fungi | [35] |”

    From Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management (2012) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VAUGHN, S. F., SPENCER, G. F., & SHASHA, B. S.
Affiliations
National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research (US)
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-07
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
793-796
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W2052489137
Cited by
118
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
fruit volatiles, raspberry, strawberry, postharvest decay, antifungal activity, benzaldehyde, (E)-2-hexenal, 2-nonanone, 1-hexanol, Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, fruit ripening, starch encapsulation, stored fruit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review