The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The reflective practitioner in nursing
Abstract
This work is a study of eight practising registered nurses and their use of reflection‐in‐achon in their everyday work Schon's work on reflection‐in‐action forms the theoretical basis, and the research tool uses the work of Mezirow and Lazzara's use of Colaizzi's reduction The findings are that, of the sample used, reflection‐in‐action is present extensively in the form of description and of planning of actions, but to a much lesser extent in the area of recognition of value judgements and the areas of reflechon‐in‐action leading to learning taking place Where these were present, albeit in small quantities, they were almost exclusively confined to the community nurses and the nurse practitioner The tool also helped determine whether or not practice was founded on the use of nursing research and/or that of other disciplines In the nurses studied here, this was somewhat erratic With changes in technology, social and environmental changes, and the advancement of nursing and social science research, it is important for registered nurses to be able to both learn from their everyday work and use knowledge from nursing and other disciplines in this, rather than, as is demonstrated here, separate theory from practice and be relatively unable to learn from their work In view of the changes presently proposed in nurse education, this work has implications for nurse educators as well as for practising nurses
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A four‐category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work
Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., & Wong, F. K. Y. (2008) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930701293355 · Cited by 444
Kuiper, R. A., & Pesut, D. J. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02921.x · Cited by 405
KEMBER, D. (1999) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/026013799293928 · Cited by 323
Lim, S.-Y., & Bae, M.-J. (2024) · Child Health Nursing Research · doi:10.4094/chnr.2024.015 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Powell, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 824-832
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W1976934559
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The reflective practitioner in nursing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01467.x
- The paper
- Powell, J. H. (1989). The reflective practitioner in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01467.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.