CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 286Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesDermatologic Treatments and ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Altered body image: appearance‐related concerns of people with visible disfigurement

Open access
Rumsey, Nichola, Clarke, Alex, White, Paul, Wyn‐Williams, Menna, Garlick, Wendy·2004·Journal of Advanced Nursing
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03227.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this paper is to report a study to establish the extent and type of psychosocial needs of outpatients attending for treatment of a wide range of disfiguring conditions. Background. Visible disfigurements can be associated with extensive psychosocial difficulties. The majority of research to date has been carried out with people identified by themselves or others as experiencing difficulties. Little is known about levels of distress in the broader population of patients receiving treatment for a range of disfiguring conditions. Methods. A cross‐sectional survey was conducted, with a convenience sample. Participants ( n = 458) drawn from 15 outpatient clinics completed standardized measures of anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), social anxiety and avoidance (Derriford Appearance Scale short‐form) and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Scale). A semi‐structured interview was used to generate further quantitative and qualitative data about individual concerns, and satisfaction with the provision of care. Staff views about levels of psychosocial distress were elicited through group discussions. Results. The results revealed high levels of psychological distress in the sample, compared with normative values. The majority of difficulties related to problems experienced in social situations. Patient satisfaction with care was generally high; however, and 71% of participants expressed a moderate to strong desire for a health care professional with training to deal with their appearance‐related concerns. Nursing staff felt unable to address patients’ appearance‐related difficulties because of time constraints, lack of an environment conducive to the discussion of patients’ concerns, and lack of appropriate knowledge and training. Conclusion. A significant proportion of participants experienced psychosocial distress in relation to their visible difference. Psychosocial needs were poorly met in current outpatient care provision, and a range of options could be considered to address these more effectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03227.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Clarke A., 2000, Social Rehabilitation After Head and Neck Cancer: A Manual for Health Professionals
  2. Kent G., 2002, Body Shame
  3. Office of Population and Census Studies, 1988, Report 1. The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults
  4. Rumsey N., 2002, Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research and Clinical Practice

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–285 of 285

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rumsey, N., Clarke, A., White, P., Wyn‐Williams, M., & Garlick, W.
Affiliations
University of the West of England (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-03
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
443-453
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03227.x
OpenAlex
W2067644418
Cited by
286
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 26
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
body image, psychosocial distress, social anxiety, social avoidance, quality of life, patient satisfaction, nursing staff training, psychosocial needs, outpatient care, anxiety and depression
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Body Image, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Wounds and Injuries, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review