Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictors of health behaviours in college students

Von Ah, Diane, Ebert, Sheryl, Ngamvitroj, Anchalee, Park, Najin, Kang, Duck‐Hee·2004·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim. This paper reports a study examining the direct effects of perceived stress, perceived availability of and satisfaction with social support, and self‐efficacy, and examines the intermediary roles of perceived threat (perceived susceptibility ×perceived severity), benefits, and barriers on alcohol behaviour, smoking behaviour, physical activity and nutrition behaviour, general safety behaviour and sun‐protective behaviour in college students. Background. Health behaviours formed during young adulthood may have a sustaining impact on health across later life. Entering college can be an exciting, yet stressful event for many adolescents and young adults as they face trying to adapt to changes in academic workloads, support networks, and their new environment. Coupled with these changes and new‐found responsibilities, they have greater freedom and control over their lifestyles than ever before. However, researchers have shown globally that many college students engage in various risky health behaviours. Method. A cross‐sectional sample of 161 college students enrolled in an introductory psychology course completed self‐report questionnaires regarding stress; social support; self‐efficacy; and components of the Health Belief Model including perceived threat, perceived benefits, perceived barriers; and common health behaviours. Step‐wise multiple regression analysis was conducted and significant predictors were retained as modifiers in the path analysis. Findings. Self‐efficacy significantly predicted alcohol and smoking behaviour, physical activity and nutrition protective behaviour, general safety protective behaviour and sun‐protective behaviour. Under high‐perceived threat, self‐efficacy was mediated by perceived barriers for binge drinking and moderated by perceived barriers for physical activity and nutrition behaviours. In addition, under high‐perceived threat, self‐efficacy was moderated by perceived threat for alcohol use at 30 days and 6 months. Under low threat, self‐efficacy was mediated by perceived barriers for smoking behaviour and general safety protective behaviours. Conclusions. Future health promotion programmes with college students must use interventions that maximize self‐efficacy and ultimately reduce barriers to adopting a healthy lifestyle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03229.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Von Ah, D., Ebert, S., Ngamvitroj, A., Park, N., & Kang, D.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-03
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
463-474
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2057072667
Cited by
352
References
8
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of health behaviours in college students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03229.x
The paper
Von Ah, D., Ebert, S., Ngamvitroj, A., Park, N., & Kang, D. (2004). Predictors of health behaviours in college students. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03229.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.