Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 515

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effectiveness of intermediate‐fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education

Open access
Alinier, Guillaume, Hunt, Barry, Gordon, Ray, Harwood, Colin·2006·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this paper is to present the results of a study designed to determine the effect of scenario‐based simulation training on nursing students’ clinical skills and competence. Background. Using full‐scale, realistic, medical simulation for training healthcare professionals is becoming more and more common. Access to this technology is easier than ever before with the opening of several simulation centres throughout the world and the availability on the market of more sophisticated and affordable patient simulators. However, there is little scientific evidence proving that such technology is better than more traditional techniques in the education of, for example, undergraduate nursing students. Methods. A pretest/post‐test design was employed with volunteer undergraduate students (n = 99) from second year Diploma of Higher Education in Nursing programme in United Kingdom using a 15‐station Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Students were randomly allocated to either a control or an experimental group. The experimental group, as well as following their normal curriculum, were exposed to simulation training. Subsequently, all students were re‐tested and completed a questionnaire. The data were collected between 2001 and 2003. Results. The control and experimental groups improved their performance on the second Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Mean test scores, respectively, increased by 7·18 and 14·18 percentage points. The difference between the means was statistically significant (P < 0·001). However, students’ perceptions of stress and confidence, measured on a 5‐point Likert scale, was very similar between groups at 2·9 (1, not stressful; 5, very stressful) and 3·5 (1, very confident; 5, not confident) for the control group, and 3·0 and 3·4 for the experimental group. Conclusions. Intermediate‐fidelity simulation is a useful training technique. It enables small groups of students to practise in a safe and controlled environment how to react adequately in a critical patient care situation. This type of training is very valuable to equip students with a minimum of technical and non‐technical skills before they use them in practice settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03810.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 515

Metadata

Authors
Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., & Harwood, C.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-21
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
359-369
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2139081920
Cited by
515
References
0
FWCI
11.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of intermediate‐fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03810.x
The paper
Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., & Harwood, C. (2006). Effectiveness of intermediate‐fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03810.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.