Cited by 65Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesHealth Sciences Research and Education

Critical thinking dispositions in baccalaureate nursing students

Shin, Kyung Rim, Lee, Ja Hyung, Ha, Ju Young, Kim, Kon Hee·2006·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim This paper reports an investigation into the critical thinking disposition of students enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing programme at a university in Korea. Background Critical thinking may be summarized as a skilled process that conceptualizes and applies information from observation, experience, reflection, inference and communication in a technical manner. It is more of a rational act used as an instrument rather than as a result. Critical thinking is a core competency in nursing and has been widely discussed in nursing education. However, the results of previous research on the effectiveness of nursing education in improving students' critical thinking have been inconsistent. Methods A longitudinal design was used with a convenience sample of 60 nursing students; 32 students participated four times in completing a questionnaire each March from 1999 to 2002. The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory was administered to measure disposition to critical thinking. Results There was a statistically significant improvement in critical thinking disposition score by academic year (F = 7.54, P = 0.0001). Among the subscales, open-mindedness, self-confidence, and maturity also showed a statistically significant difference by academic year (P = 0.0194, 0.0041, 0.0044). Conclusion Teaching strategies to enhance critical thinking should be developed, in addition to further research on the effect of the nursing curriculum on students' critical thinking. Moreover, surv…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03995.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive maturity is conceptualized in recent literature not as a short-term malleable state, but as a deeply ingrained, slower-changing trait.

    “Cognitive maturity—the disposition to recognize the complexity of problems and to make judgments under uncertainty—is conceptualized in recent literature not as a short-term malleable state, but as a deeply ingrained, slower-changing trait (28).”

Authors
Shin, K. R., Lee, J. H., Ha, J. Y., & Kim, K. H.
Affiliations
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-10
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
182-189
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2047789509
Cited by
65
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
critical thinking disposition, baccalaureate nursing students, nursing education, California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory, open-mindedness, self-confidence, maturity, academic year differences, Korean culture, nursing curriculum
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Judgment, Korea, Longitudinal Studies, Students, Nursing, Thinking, Nursing Education Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review