The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction diversity within quantified insect food webs in restored and adjacent intensively managed meadows
Open accessAbstract
1. We studied the community and food-web structure of trap-nesting insects in restored meadows and at increasing distances within intensively managed grassland at 13 sites in Switzerland to test if declining species diversity correlates with declining interaction diversity and changes in food-web structure. 2. We analysed 49 quantitative food webs consisting of a total of 1382 trophic interactions involving 39 host/prey insect species and 14 parasitoid/predator insect species. Species richness and abundance of three functional groups, bees and wasps as the lower trophic level and natural enemies as the higher trophic level, were significantly higher in restored than in adjacent intensively managed meadows. Diversity and abundance of specific trophic interactions also declined from restored to intensively managed meadows. 3. The proportion of attacked brood cells and the mortality of bees and wasps due to natural enemies were significantly higher in restored than in intensively managed meadows. Bee abundance and the rate of attacked brood cells of bees declined with increasing distance from restored meadows. These findings indicate that interaction diversity declines more rapidly than species diversity in our study system. 4. Quantitative measures of food-web structure (linkage density, interaction diversity, interaction evenness and compartment diversity) were higher in restored than in intensively managed meadows. This was reflected in a higher mean number of host/prey species per consumer species (degree of generalism) in restored than in intensively managed meadows. 5. The higher insect species and interaction diversity was related to higher plant species richness in restored than in intensively managed meadows. In particular, bees and natural enemies reacted positively to increased plant diversity. 6. Our findings provide empirical evidence for the theoretical prediction that decreasing species richness at lower trophic levels should reduce species richness at higher trophic levels, and in addition lead to even stronger reductions in interaction diversity at these higher levels. Species at higher trophic levels may thus benefit relatively more than species at lower trophic levels from habitat restoration in the grassland ecosystems studied. We also demonstrate enhanced compartment diversity and lower interaction evenness in restored than in intensively managed meadows, both of which are theoretically positively associated with increased ecosystem stability in restored meadows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504 · Cited by 3,160
Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies
Moran, M. D. (2003) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12010.x · Cited by 1,484 · cited 1×
“We did not apply sequential Bonferroni, because this procedure can lead to very low statistical power and either an overemphasis on not rejecting null hypotheses (Moran 2003), or an unwarranted rejection of covariables in statistical analyses.”
MethodWhich traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments?
Davies, K. F., Margules, C. R., & Lawrence, J. F. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1450:wtospp]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 444
Cited by
Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe
Tsiafouli, M. A., Thébault, E., Sgardelis, S. P., de Ruiter, P. C., van der Putten, W. H., Birkhofer, K., Hemerik, L., de Vries, F. T., Bardgett, R. D., Brady, M. V., et al. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12752 · Cited by 1,108
Review: Ecological networks – beyond food webs
Ings, T. C., Montoya, J. M., Bascompte, J., Blüthgen, N., Brown, L., Dormann, C. F., Edwards, F., Figueroa, D., Jacob, U., Jones, J. I., et al. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01460.x · Cited by 934
WHAT DO INTERACTION NETWORK METRICS TELL US ABOUT SPECIALIZATION AND BIOLOGICAL TRAITS
Blüthgen, N., Fründ, J., Vázquez, D. P., & Menzel, F. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-2121.1 · Cited by 516
Holzschuh, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., & Tscharntke, T. (2010) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01642.x · Cited by 321
Martinson, H. M., & Fagan, W. F. (2014) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12305 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- ALBRECHT, M., DUELLI, P., SCHMID, B., & MÜLLER, C. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-07
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1015-1025
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2026691876
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction diversity within quantified insect food webs in restored and adjacent intensively managed meadows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01264.x
- The paper
- ALBRECHT, M., DUELLI, P., SCHMID, B., & MÜLLER, C. B. (2007). Interaction diversity within quantified insect food webs in restored and adjacent intensively managed meadows. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01264.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.