Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exposure of non-target small mammals to rodenticides. Short term effects, recovery and implications for secondary poisoning

BRAKES, C. R., SMITH, R. H.·2005·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Monitoring of exposure to pesticides in many countries shows extensive exposure of predators to anticoagulant rodenticides, which are used to control rats. Many predators and scavengers are declining in numbers, and exposure to rodenticides might therefore be of importance in conservation biology. Predators and scavengers of poisoned rats are at most risk of secondary poisoning. However, several predatory species of conservation concern rarely eat rats, implicating non‐target small mammals as the major route of exposure. For the first time, this research investigated the importance of non‐target small mammals as routes of exposure to rodenticide for predators and scavengers in the UK. Exposure studies of non‐target small mammals were carried out alongside routine rat control at five sites, around agricultural buildings ( n = 2) and feed hoppers for game birds ( n = 3). Three non‐target rodent species fed on rodenticide from bait boxes during routine rat control treatments. A large proportion (48·6%) of individuals in local populations ate the bait: woodmice Apodemus sylvaticus were most exposed, followed by bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus then field voles Microtus agrestis . Local populations of non‐target small mammals declined significantly following rodenticidal rat control but their relative proportions did not change significantly. Populations recovered partially after 3 months, depending on the time of the year relative to the breeding cycle. Synthesis and applications. Our results clearly demonstrate that routine rat control reduced local populations of non‐target small mammals. This may limit the food supply of some specialist predators. Most importantly, this demonstrates a significant route of exposure of predators and scavengers of small mammals to secondary poisoning. Rodenticides are applied on farms and game estates across the UK. Hence the results of this study are indicative of non‐target rodenticide exposure nationally. Mitigation requires a shift from the current reliance on rodenticides to ecologically based rodent management, involving improvements in site management and the adoption of good farming practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.00997.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. Anonymous, 1981, Secondary poisoning of weasels by rodenticides. MAFF ADAS, Agricultural Science Service Research and Development Reports, 252, 37
  2. Barnett S., 1963, The Rat
  3. 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00242-7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00175-4 · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(97)00175-4
  5. Brakes C.R.(2003)The exposure of non‐target wildlife to rodenticides with special reference to the red kite(Milvus milvus).PhD Thesis.University of Leicester Leicester UK.
  6. Buckle A.P., 1994, Rodent Pests and Their Control, 127
  7. Burn A.J., 2002, The threats to birds of prey in the UK from second‐generation rodenticides, Aspects of Applied Biology, 67, 203
  8. Churchfield S., 1990, The Natural History of Shrews.
  9. Cicero C., 1993, Vulnerability of prey stimulates attacks by jays and shrikes on adult birds, Western Birds, 24, 101
  10. Colvin B.A.(1984)Barn owl foraging behaviour and secondary poisoning hazard from rodenticide use on farms.PhD Thesis.Bowling Green State University Bowling Green OH USA.
  11. Cox P.(1991)Environmental effects of rodenticide use.PhD Thesis.University of Reading Reading UK.
  12. 10.2307/2389592 · DOI
  13. Dawson A., 2003, Pesticide Usage Survey Report 175: Rodenticide Usage on Farms in Great Britain Growing Arable Crops 2000.
  14. 10.1080/03014223.1995.9518055 · doi:10.1080/03014223.1995.9518055
  15. Eason C.T., 1999, Secondary and tertiary poisoning risks associated with brodifacoum, New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 23, 219
  16. 10.1023/A:1013793029831 · doi:10.1023/a:1013793029831
  17. 10.2307/3543510 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/3544627 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/4449 · doi:10.2307/4449
  20. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb03741.x · DOI
  21. 10.2307/3195 · doi:10.2307/3195
  22. Flowerdew J.R., 1993, Mice and Voles
  23. 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1974.tb00232.x · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1974.tb00232.x
  24. Gipps J.H.W., 1985, The Ecology of Woodland Rodents; Bank Voles and Woodmice, 61
  25. 10.1080/00063657709476536 · doi:10.1080/00063657709476536
  26. Godfrey M.E.R., 1985, Non‐target and secondary poisoning hazards of ‘second‐generation’ anticoagulants, Acta Zoologica Fennica, 173, 209
  27. Greenwood J.J.D., 1996, Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook, 11
  28. Gurnell J., 1994, Live Trapping Small Mammals: A Practical Guide.
  29. Hansson L., 1985, The Ecology of Woodland Rodents: Bank Voles and Woodmice, 141
  30. Harradine J.P.(1976)Anticoagulant rodenticides and non‐target wildlife: an ecological evaluation of permanent baiting in rural rat control.PhD Thesis.University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.
  31. 10.1023/A:1008951701780 · DOI
  32. 10.3109/00498258809042269 · doi:10.3109/00498258809042269
  33. 10.3109/00498258909034676 · doi:10.3109/00498258909034676
  34. 10.1016/S0003-3472(06)80010-2 · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(06)80010-2
  35. 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1998.tb00717.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2338.1998.tb00717.x
  36. 10.2307/4593 · DOI · Paper page
  37. King C., 1989, The Natural History of Weasels and Stoats
  38. 10.1071/WR01068 · doi:10.1071/wr01068
  39. Macdonald D.W., 1987, Running with the Fox
  40. 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2000.00053.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2000.00053.x
  41. 10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00141-9 · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(98)00141-9
  42. Montgomery W.I., 1985, The Ecology of Woodland Rodents: Bank Voles and Woodmice, 89
  43. 10.1080/03014223.1998.9518161 · doi:10.1080/03014223.1998.9518161
  44. 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90157-1 · doi:10.1016/0269-7491(88)90157-1
  45. Newton I., 1998, Population Limitation in Birds
  46. Newton I., 1999, Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management, 347
  47. Noble D.G., 2001, The Breeding Bird Survey 2000.
  48. 10.2307/3800575 · doi:10.2307/3800575
  49. Parmar G., 1987, Evidence for a common binding site in vivo for the retention of anticoagulants in rat liver, Human Toxicology, 6, 431
  50. Popham E.J., 1943, Further experimental studies of the selective action of predators, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London A, 112, 105, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1943.tb00074.x · DOI
  51. 10.2307/3564663 · DOI
  52. 10.2307/3565185 · DOI
  53. 10.1520/STP35992S · doi:10.1520/stp35992s
  54. Shawyer C.R., 1987, The Barn Owl in the British Isles: Its Past, Present and Future.
  55. Shepherd D.S., 1984, Proceedings of the 11th Vertebrate Pest Conference, 112
  56. Shore R.F., 1999, Exposure of non‐target vertebrates to second‐generation rodenticides in Britain, with particular reference to the polecat Mustela putorius, New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 23, 199
  57. 10.1016/0269-7491(95)00074-7 · doi:10.1016/0269-7491(95)00074-7
  58. Shore R.F., 2001, Rodenticide Residues in the Kestrel Falco tinnunculus.
  59. Smith R.H., 1999, Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management, 331
  60. Smith R.H., 1990, Proceedings of the 14th Vertebrate Pest Conference, 47
  61. 10.1080/00063656809476184 · doi:10.1080/00063656809476184
  62. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1970.tb01264.x · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.7589/0090-3558-35.2.187 · doi:10.7589/0090-3558-35.2.187
  64. Stutzenbaker C.D., 1986, Proceedings of Symposium on Lead Poisoning in Wild Waterfowl, 88
  65. Sullivan T.P., 1986, Poison or Population Dynamics? Control of Mammal Pests, 69
  66. 10.2307/4182 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/0006-3207(93)90052-3 · DOI
  68. Thomas M.R., 1996, Pesticide Usage Survey Report 130: Rodenticide Usage on Farms in Great Britain Growing Arable Crops 1994.
  69. 10.1163/036551660X00053 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.2307/3801205 · doi:10.2307/3801205
  71. 10.1007/BF00192595 · doi:10.1007/bf00192595
  72. 10.2307/3807894 · doi:10.2307/3807894
  73. 10.1080/00063658109476726 · doi:10.1080/00063658109476726
  74. Watson D., 1977, The Hen Harrier
  75. Wolton R.J., 1985, The Ecology of Woodland Rodents: Bank Voles and Woodmice, 249
  76. 10.1016/0006-3207(77)90033-7 · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(77)90033-7
  77. World Health Organization, 1995, Anticoagulant Rodenticides.

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
BRAKES, C. R., & SMITH, R. H.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
118-128
ISSN
  • 0021-8901
  • 1365-2664
Cited by
182
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exposure of non-target small mammals to rodenticides. Short term effects, recovery and implications for secondary poisoning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.00997.x
The paper
BRAKES, C. R., & SMITH, R. H. (2005). Exposure of non-target small mammals to rodenticides. Short term effects, recovery and implications for secondary poisoning. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.00997.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.