The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires that all European waterbodies are assigned to one of five ecological classes, based primarily on biological indicators, and that minimum good ecological quality is obtained by 2015. However, the directive provides only general guidance regarding indicator definitions and determination of boundaries between classes. We used chemical and biological data from 709 Danish lakes to investigate whether and how lake types respond differently to eutrophication. In the absence of well‐defined reference conditions, lakes were grouped according to alkalinity and water depth, and the responses to eutrophication were ordered along a total phosphorus (TP) gradient to test the applicability of pre‐defined boundaries. As a preliminary classification we suggest a TP‐based classification into high, good, moderate, bad and poor ecological quality using 0–25, 25–50, 50–100, 100–200 and > 200 µg P L−1 boundaries for shallow lakes, and 0–12·5, 12·5–25, 25–50, 50–100 and > 100 µg P L−1 boundaries for deep lakes. Within each TP category, median values are used to define preliminary boundaries for the biological indicators. Most indicators responded strongly to increasing TP, but there were only minor differences between low and high alkalinity lakes and modest variations between deep and shallow lakes. The variability of indicators within a given TP range was, however, high, and for most indicators there was a considerable overlap between adjacent TP categories. Cyanophyte biomass, submerged macrophyte coverage, fish numbers and chlorophyll a were among the ‘best’ indicators, but their ability to separate different TP classes varied with TP. When using multiple indicators the risk that one or more indicators will indicate different ecological classes is high because of a high variability of all indicators within a specific TP class, and the ‘one out – all out’ principle in relation to indicators does not seem feasible. Alternatively a certain compliance level or a ‘mean value’ of the indicators can be used to define ecological classes. A precise ecological quality ratio (EQR) using values between 0 and 1 can be calculated based on the extent to which the total number of indicators meets the boundary conditions, as demonstrated from three Danish lakes. Synthesis and applications. The analysis of Danish lakes has identified a number of useful indicators for lake quality and has suggested a method for calculating an ecological quality ratio. However, it also demonstrates that the implementation of the Water Framework Directive faces several challenges: gradual rather than stepwise changes for all indicators, large variability of indicators within lake classes, and problems using the one out – all out principle for lake classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ter Braak, C. J. F., & Šmilauer, P. (2002) · Cited by 9,306
(2001) · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02112-6 · Cited by 3,901
Limnology, Lake and River Ecosystems
Lembi, C. A. (2001) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.37602.x · Cited by 3,889
Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes
Scheffer, M., Hosper, S. H., Meijer, M.-L., Moss, B., & Jeppesen, E. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90254-m · Cited by 2,808
Self-citationter Braak, C., & Šmilauer, P. (2002) · Cited by 2,496
Role of sediment and internal loading of phosphorus in shallow lakes
Søndergaard, M., Jensen, J. P., & Jeppesen, E. (2003) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1023/b:hydr.0000008611.12704.dd · Cited by 1,632
Self-citationA review of some problems in zooplankton production studies
Bottrell, H. H. (1976) · Cited by 1,454
The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes
(1998) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0695-8 · Cited by 1,345
JEPPESEN, E., SØNDERGAARD, M., JENSEN, J. P., HAVENS, K. E., ANNEVILLE, O., CARVALHO, L., COVENEY, M. F., DENEKE, R., DOKULIL, M. T., FOY, B., et al. (2005) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01415.x · Cited by 1,334
Self-citationDumont, H. J., Van de Velde, I., & Dumont, S. (1975) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00377592 · Cited by 1,266
Cited by
Jeppesen, E., Nõges, P., Davidson, T. A., Haberman, J., Nõges, T., Blank, K., Lauridsen, T. L., Søndergaard, M., Sayer, C., Laugaste, R., et al. (2011) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-011-0831-0 · Cited by 451
Self-citationStrength and uncertainty of phytoplankton metrics for assessing eutrophication impacts in lakes
Carvalho, L., Poikane, S., Lyche Solheim, A., Phillips, G., Borics, G., Catalan, J., De Hoyos, C., Drakare, S., Dudley, B. J., Järvinen, M., et al. (2013) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1344-1 · Cited by 165
Is eutrophication really a major impairment for small waterbody biodiversity?
Rosset, V., Angélibert, S., Arthaud, F., Bornette, G., Robin, J., Wezel, A., Vallod, D., & Oertli, B. (2014) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12201 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- SØNDERGAARD, M., JEPPESEN, E., PEDER JENSEN, J., & LILDAL AMSINCK, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-13
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 616-629
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1485294342
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01040.x
- The paper
- SØNDERGAARD, M., JEPPESEN, E., PEDER JENSEN, J., & LILDAL AMSINCK, S. (2005). Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01040.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.