The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of landscape complexity on arable weed species diversity in organic and conventional farming
Open accessAbstract
Summary: There is growing concern about declining species diversity in agro‐ecosystems caused by agricultural intensification at the field and landscape scales. Species diversity of arable weeds is classically related to local abiotic factors and resource conditions. It is believed to be enhanced by organic farming but the surrounding landscape may also be important. This study assessed the ruderal vegetation, seed bank and seed rain in 24 winter wheat fields to examine the relative importance of organic vs. conventional farming and landscape complexity for weed species diversity. Diversity was partitioned into its additive components: alpha, beta and gamma diversity. Percentage arable land in a circular landscape sector of 1‐km radius around each study site was used as an indicator of landscape complexity. Weed species diversity in the vegetation, seed rain and seed bank was higher in organic than in conventional fields. Increasing landscape complexity enhanced species diversity more strongly in the vegetation of conventional than organic fields, to the extent that diversity was similar in both farming systems when the landscape was complex. Species diversity of the seed bank was increased by landscape complexity irrespective of farming system. Overall diversity was largely determined by the high heterogeneity between and within the fields (beta diversity). Only in very few cases could higher weed species diversity in complex landscapes and/or organic farming be related to species dependence on landscape or farming system. Synthesis and applications. Local weed species diversity was influenced by both landscape complexity and farming system. Species diversity under organic farming systems was clearly higher in simple landscapes. Conventional vegetation reached similar diversity levels when the surrounding landscape was complex through the presence of refugia for weed populations. Consequently, agri‐environment schemes designed to preserve and enhance biodiversity should not only consider the management of single fields but also of the surrounding landscape.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1 · Cited by 11,187
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
Resource Competition and Community Structure.
Harper, J. L., & Tilman, D. (1983) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259756 · Cited by 4,180
Resource Competition and Community Structure
Hassell, M. P., & Tilman, D. (1984) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4549 · Cited by 4,176
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Weaver, T., & Grime, J. P. (1980) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3898436 · Cited by 2,548
Does organic farming benefit biodiversity?
Hole, D. G., Perkins, A. J., Wilson, J. D., Alexander, I. H., Grice, P. V., & Evans, A. D. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018 · Cited by 1,597
Biological Determinants of Species Diversity
Shmida, A., & Wilson, M. V. (1985) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.2307/2845026 · Cited by 1,521
Cited by
Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—Ecosystem service management
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., & Thies, C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x · Cited by 4,455
Self-citationLandscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes ‐ eight hypotheses
Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J. M., Rand, T. A., Didham, R. K., Fahrig, L., Batáry, P., Bengtsson, J., Clough, Y., Crist, T. O., Dormann, C. F., et al. (2012) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00216.x · Cited by 2,134
Self-citationGomiero, T., Pimentel, D., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.554355 · Cited by 915
Land‐use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta‐analysis
Tuck, S. L., Winqvist, C., Mota, F., Ahnström, J., Turnbull, L. A., & Bengtsson, J. (2014) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12219 · Cited by 846
Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale
Tscharntke, T., Bommarco, R., Clough, Y., Crist, T. O., Kleijn, D., Rand, T. A., Tylianakis, J. M., Nouhuys, S. V., & Vidal, S. (2007) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.006 · Cited by 776
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ROSCHEWITZ, I., GABRIEL, D., TSCHARNTKE, T., & THIES, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 873-882
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1547421393
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of landscape complexity on arable weed species diversity in organic and conventional farming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01072.x
- The paper
- ROSCHEWITZ, I., GABRIEL, D., TSCHARNTKE, T., & THIES, C. (2005). The effects of landscape complexity on arable weed species diversity in organic and conventional farming. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01072.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.