The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores
Abstract
Summary: High‐density populations of large herbivores are now widespread. Wildlife managers commonly attempt to control large herbivores through hunting to meet specific management objectives, considering population density as the minimal key source of information. Here, we review the problems of censusing populations of large herbivores and describe an alternative approach, employing indicators of ecological change. Estimating density of large herbivores with high precision and accuracy is difficult, especially over large areas, and requires considerable investment of time, people and money. Management decisions are often made on an annual basis, informed by population changes over the previous year. However, estimating year‐to‐year changes in density is not a realistic goal for most large herbivores. Furthermore, population density per se provides no information on the relationship between the population and its habitat. For successful management of large herbivores, we need to consider not only the fate of the population, but rather changes in both population and habitat features, as well as their interaction. Managers require information on trends in both the animal population and habitat quality in order to interpret changes in the interaction between these two compartments. We propose that a set of indicators of animal performance, population abundance, habitat quality and/or herbivore habitat impact provides relevant information on the population–habitat system. Monitoring temporal changes in these indicators provides a new basis for setting hunting quotas to achieve specific management objectives. This sort of adaptive management is employed widely in France for managing roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Synthesis and applications. The management of large herbivores would be improved by investing fewer resources in trying to estimate the absolute abundance of ungulates, and more resources in collecting additional data to inform understanding of the ecological status of the ungulate–habitat system being managed. This paper presents a set of indicators of ecological change for monitoring the interaction between a population and its habitat as a basis for adaptive management to attain explicit goals and to improve knowledge of the system. This approach could improve management for a variety of large herbivores, by harmonizing actions at wide spatial scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change
Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.-M., Tucker, C. J., & Stenseth, N. C. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011 · Cited by 3,584
Self-citationAdaptive Management of Renewable Resources.
Rutherford, A. A., & Walters, C. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531565 · Cited by 3,308
Analysis and Management of Animal Populations
Grand, J. B., Williams, B. K., Nichols, J. D., & Conroy, M. J. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802722 · Cited by 2,671
Analysis of vertebrate populations
Caughley, G. (1977) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 1,967
Distance Sampling-Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.
Sprent, P., Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., & Laake, J. L. (1994) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404172 · Cited by 1,855
Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores
Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Yoccoz, N. G., Loison, A., & Toïgo, C. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.367 · Cited by 1,729
Self-citationStochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation
Lande, R., Engen, S., & Saether, B.-E. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525257.001.0001 · Cited by 1,611
Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time
Yoccoz, N. G., Nichols, J. D., & Boulinier, T. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02205-4 · Cited by 1,432
Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators
Dale, V. H., & Beyeler, S. C. (2001) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/s1470-160x(01)00003-6 · Cited by 1,356
Distance Sampling: Estimating abundance of biological populations
Buckland, S. T. (1993) · Cited by 1,249
Cited by
Weeds, worms, and deer: positive relationships among common forest understory stressors
Fisichelli, N. A., & Miller, K. M. (2018) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-017-1630-y · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- MORELLET, N., GAILLARD, J., HEWISON, A. J. M., BALLON, P., BOSCARDIN, Y., DUNCAN, P., KLEIN, F., & MAILLARD, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-13
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 634-643
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1489407299
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 9.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01307.x
- The paper
- MORELLET, N., GAILLARD, J., HEWISON, A. J. M., BALLON, P., BOSCARDIN, Y., DUNCAN, P., KLEIN, F., & MAILLARD, D. (2007). Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01307.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.