The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In search of forage: predicting dynamic habitats of Mongolian gazelles using satellite‐based estimates of vegetation productivity
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Temporal variability in habitat suitability has important conservation and ecological implications. In grasslands, changes in resource availability can occur at broad spatial scales and enlarge area requirements of ungulate populations, which increases their vulnerability to habitat loss and fragmentation. Understanding and predicting these dynamics, although critical, has received little attention so far. We investigated habitat dynamics for Mongolian gazelles (Procapra gutturosa Pallas) in the eastern steppes of Mongolia. We quantified the distribution of gazelles at four different time periods and tracked primary productivity using Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data from satellite imagery. A second‐order logistic model showed that NDVI was an efficient predictor of gazelle presence. We tested the predictive power of the model with independent data from a gazelle telemetry study: 85% of all relocations were found within the predicted area. Gazelles preferred an intermediate range of vegetation productivity, presumably facing quality quantity trade‐offs where areas with low NDVI are limited by low ingestion rates, and areas with high NDVI are limited by the low digestibility of mature forage. Spatiotemporal variation of gazelle habitat areas was high. Only 15% of the study area was consistently gazelle habitat throughout all survey periods, indicating that gazelles need to range over vast areas in search of food. Only 1% of the gazelle habitats were consistently located inside protected areas. Synthesis and applications.Habitat variability in grasslands often leads to area requirements of ungulates that prevent effective conservation within single protected areas. They require landscape‐level management plans, but dynamic habitat predictions to inform such plans are difficult to implement and are often unavailable. We showed that satellite estimates of vegetation productivity can be used successfully to generate dynamic habitat models in landscapes with highly variable resources, and demonstrated that intermediate NDVI values were critical to predict occurrence of Mongolian gazelles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecology of a Grazing Ecosystem: The Serengeti
McNaughton, S. J. (1985) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942578 · Cited by 1,367 · cited 4×
“As grasses mature, they accumulate structural tissues and their fibre content increases, reducing their digestibility (McNaughton 1984, 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Last Mile: How to Sustain Long‐Distance Migration in Mammals
BERGER, J. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00548.x · Cited by 524
Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest.
Thirgood, S., Mosser, A., Tham, S., Hopcraft, G., Mwangomo, E., Mlengeya, T., Kilewo, M., Fryxell, J., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Borner, M. (2004) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1017/s1367943004001404 · Cited by 253
Serengeti wildebeest migratory patterns modeled from rainfall and new vegetation growth
Boone, R. B., Thirgood, S. J., & Hopcraft, J. G. C. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1987:swmpmf]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 215
Simulating the East African wildebeest migration patterns using GIS and remote sensing
Musiega, D. E., & Kazadi, S. (2004) · African Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2004.00538.x · Cited by 46
Cited by
Going, Going, Gone: Is Animal Migration Disappearing
Wilcove, D. S., & Wikelski, M. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060188 · Cited by 717
Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation
Allen, A. M., & Singh, N. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2015.00155 · Cited by 441
Global decline in aggregated migrations of large terrestrial mammals
Harris, G., Thirgood, S., Hopcraft, J., Cromsight, J., & Berger, J. (2009) · Endangered Species Research · doi:10.3354/esr00173 · Cited by 419
Mueller, T., & Fagan, W. F. (2008) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16291.x · Cited by 399
Self-citationForaging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement
Owen-Smith, N., Fryxell, J. M., & Merrill, E. H. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0095 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, T., Olson, K. A., Fuller, T. K., Schaller, G. B., Murray, M. G., & Leimgruber, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09-05
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 649-658
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2170279987
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In search of forage: predicting dynamic habitats of Mongolian gazelles using satellite‐based estimates of vegetation productivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01371.x
- The paper
- Mueller, T., Olson, K. A., Fuller, T. K., Schaller, G. B., Murray, M. G., & Leimgruber, P. (2008). In search of forage: predicting dynamic habitats of Mongolian gazelles using satellite‐based estimates of vegetation productivity. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01371.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.