The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation
Open accessAbstract
A common challenge in species conservation and management is how to incorporate species movements into management objectives. There often is a lack of knowledge of where, when and why species move. The field of movement ecology has grown rapidly in the last decade and is now providing the knowledge needed to incorporate movements of species into management planning. This knowledge can also be used to develop management strategies that are flexible in time and space and may improve the effectiveness of management actions. Therefore, wildlife management and conservation may benefit by strengthening the link with movement ecology. We present a framework that illustrates how animal movement can be used to enhance conservation planning and identify management actions that are complementary to existing strategies. The framework contains five steps that identify (1) the movement attributes of a species, (2) their impacts on ecosystems, (3) how this knowledge can be used to guide the scale and type of management, (4) the implementation, and (5) the evaluation of management actions. We discuss these five steps in detail, highlighting why the step is important and how the information can be obtained. We illustrate the framework through a case study of managing a highly mobile species, the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), a harvested species of conservation concern. We believe that the movement-management framework provides an important, and timely, link between movement ecology and wildlife management and conservation, and highlights the potential for complementary, dynamic solutions for managing wildlife.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic conservation planning
Margules, C. R., & Pressey, R. L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012251 · Cited by 4,631
The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference
Johnson, D. H. (1980) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937156 · Cited by 4,388
A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research
Nathan, R., Getz, W. M., Revilla, E., Holyoak, M., Kadmon, R., Saltz, D., & Smouse, P. E. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800375105 · Cited by 2,968
Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment
Nathan, R., & Muller-Landau, H. C. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01874-7 · Cited by 2,094
Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions
Guisan, A., Tingley, R., Baumgartner, J. B., Naujokaitis‐Lewis, I., Sutcliffe, P. R., Tulloch, A. I. T., Regan, T. J., Brotons, L., McDonald‐Madden, E., Mantyka‐Pringle, C., et al. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12189 · Cited by 2,068
An assessment of the published results of animal relocations
Fischer, J., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2000) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00048-3 · Cited by 1,534
Kremen, C., Williams, N. M., Aizen, M. A., Gemmill‐Herren, B., LeBuhn, G., Minckley, R., Packer, L., Potts, S. G., Roulston, T., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., et al. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x · Cited by 1,493
Klemetsen, A., Amundsen, P. ‐., Dempson, J. B., Jonsson, B., Jonsson, N., O'Connell, M. F., & Mortensen, E. (2003) · Ecology of Freshwater Fish · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0633.2003.00010.x · Cited by 1,382
Understanding and managing conservation conflicts
Redpath, S. M., Young, J., Evely, A., Adams, W. M., Sutherland, W. J., Whitehouse, A., Amar, A., Lambert, R. A., Linnell, J. D. C., Watt, A., et al. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021 · Cited by 1,361
Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments
Ferraro, P. J., & Pattanayak, S. K. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105 · Cited by 1,312
Cited by
Suite of simple metrics reveals common movement syndromes across vertebrate taxa
Abrahms, B., Seidel, D. P., Dougherty, E., Hazen, E. L., Bograd, S. J., Wilson, A. M., Weldon McNutt, J., Costa, D. P., Blake, S., Brashares, J. S., et al. (2017) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-017-0104-2 · Cited by 109
A Novel Framework to Protect Animal Data in a World of Ecosurveillance
Lennox, R. J., Harcourt, R., Bennett, J. R., Davies, A., Ford, A. T., Frey, R. M., Hayward, M. W., Hussey, N. E., Iverson, S. J., Kays, R., et al. (2020) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa035 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, A. M., & Singh, N. J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-01-12
- Volume
- 3
- ISSN
- 2296-701X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2234983292
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 124
- FWCI
- 22.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fevo.2015.00155
- The paper
- Allen, A. M., & Singh, N. J. (2016). Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2015.00155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
