Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 747

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe

Open access
Chytrý, Milan, Maskell, Lindsay C., Pino, Joan, Pyšek, Petr, Vilà, Montserrat, Font, Xavier, Smart, Simon M.·2008·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Although invasions by alien plants are major threats to the biodiversity of natural habitats, individual habitats vary considerably in their susceptibility to invasion. Therefore the risk assessment procedures, which are used increasingly by environmental managers to inform effective planning of invasive plant control, require reliable quantitative information on the extent to which different habitats are susceptible to invasion. It is also important to know whether the levels of invasion in different habitats are locally specific or consistent among regions with contrasting climate, flora and history of human impact. We compiled a database of 52 480 vegetation plots from three regions of Europe: Catalonia (Mediterranean–submediterranean region), Czech Republic (subcontinental) and Great Britain (oceanic). We classified plant species into neophytes, archaeophytes and natives, and calculated the proportion of each group in 33 habitats described by the European Nature Information System (EUNIS) classification. Of 545 alien species found in the plots, only eight occurred in all three regions. Despite this large difference in species composition, patterns of habitat invasions were highly consistent between regions. None or few aliens were found in environmentally extreme and nutrient‐poor habitats, e.g. mires, heathlands and high‐mountain grasslands. Many aliens were found in frequently disturbed habitats with fluctuating nutrient availability, e.g. in man‐made habitats. Neophytes were also often found in coastal, littoral and riverine habitats. Neophytes were found commonly in habitats also occupied by archaeophytes. Thus, the number of archaeophytes can be considered as a good predictor of the neophyte invasion risk. However, neophytes had stronger affinity to wet habitats and disturbed woody vegetation while archaeophytes tended to be more common in dry to mesic open habitats. Synthesis and applications. The considerable inter‐regional consistency of the habitat invasion patterns suggests that habitats can be used as a good predictor for the invasion risk assessment. This finding opens promising perspectives for the use of spatially explicit information on habitats, including scenarios of future land‐use change, to identify the areas of highest risk of invasion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01398.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Bolòs O., 1993, Flora Manual dels Països Catalans
  2. Di Castri F., 1989, Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective, 1
  3. Di Castri F., 1990, Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin, 3, 10.1007/978-94-009-1876-4_1 · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1876-4_1
  4. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02183.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chytrý M., 2005, Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats, Preslia, 77, 339
  6. Chytrý M., 2003, Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation‐plot data, Preslia, 75, 1
  7. Crawley M.J., 1987, Colonization, Succession and Stability, 429
  8. Daehler C.C., 2006, Invasibility of tropical islands: partitioning the influence of isolation and propagule pressure, Preslia, 78, 389
  9. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00066.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00473.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00025.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00174-3 · doi:10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00174-3
  13. Font X., 1995, A regional project for drawing up inventories of flora and vegetation in Catalonia (Spain), Annali di Botanica, 53, 99
  14. 10.2307/3237010 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01227.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02388.x · doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02388.x
  17. Kowarik I., 1995, Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems, 83
  18. 10.1002/fedr.200311015 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1466-882X.2004.00064.x · DOI
  20. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1522:GPOPIA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00484.x · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00484.x
  23. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01172.x · DOI
  24. 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0025:EPSIHS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Preston C.D., 2002, New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora
  26. Pyšek P., 2005, Invasive Plants: Agricultural and Ecological Aspects, 77, 10.1007/3-7643-7380-6_5 · DOI
  27. 10.1890/04-0012 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Pyšek P., 2006, Who cites who in the invasion zoo: insights from an analysis of the most highly cited papers in invasion ecology, Preslia, 78, 437
  29. Pyšek P., 2002, Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic, Preslia, 74, 97
  30. Rejmánek M., 1989, Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective, 369
  31. Rejmánek M., 2006, Invasive Alien Plants: Searching for Solutions, 104
  32. Rejmánek M., 2005, Vegetation Ecology, 332
  33. 10.1191/0309133306pp490pr · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1017/9780521235587 · doi:10.1017/9780521235587
  35. Rodwell J.S., 2002, The Diversity of European Vegetation
  36. 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.027 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb01279.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb01279.x
  38. 10.14512/gaia.14.1.20 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00166.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00177-9 · DOI
  41. 10.1890/04-1195 · DOI
  42. 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0025:EPSIHS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Stohlgren T.J., 2006, Scale and plant invasions: a theory of biotic acceptance, Preslia, 78, 405
  44. Tutin T.G., 1968, Flora Europaea
  45. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02513.x · DOI
  46. Walter J., 2005, Neophytes in Austria: habitat preferences and ecological effects, Neobiota, 6, 13
  47. 10.2307/3237208 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/978-94-010-2701-4_20 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 747

Metadata

Authors
Chytrý, M., Maskell, L. C., Pino, J., Pyšek, P., Vilà, M., Font, X., & Smart, S. M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-18
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
448-458
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W2124383227
Cited by
747
References
1
FWCI
27.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01398.x
The paper
Chytrý, M., Maskell, L. C., Pino, J., Pyšek, P., Vilà, M., Font, X., & Smart, S. M. (2008). Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01398.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.