The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi‐scale occupancy estimation and modelling using multiple detection methods
Open accessAbstract
1 Occupancy estimation and modelling based on detection–nondetection data provide an effective way of exploring change in a species’ distribution across time and space in cases where the species is not always detected with certainty. Today, many monitoring programmes target multiple species, or life stages within a species, requiring the use of multiple detection methods. When multiple methods or devices are used at the same sample sites, animals can be detected by more than one method. 2 We develop occupancy models for multiple detection methods that permit simultaneous use of data from all methods for inference about method-specific detection probabilities. Moreover, the approach permits estimation of occupancy at two spatial scales: the larger scale corresponds to species’ use of a sample unit, whereas the smaller scale corresponds to presence of the species at the local sample station or site. 3 We apply the models to data collected on two different vertebrate species: striped skunks Mephitis mephitis and red salamanders Pseudotriton ruber. For striped skunks, large-scale occupancy estimates were consistent between two sampling seasons. Small-scale occupancy probabilities were slightly lower in the late winter/spring when skunks tend to conserve energy, and movements are limited to males in search of females for breeding. There was strong evidence of method-specific detection probabilities for skunks. As anticipated, large- and small-scale occupancy areas completely overlapped for red salamanders. The analyses provided weak evidence of method-specific detection probabilities for this species. 4 Synthesis and applications. Increasingly, many studies are utilizing multiple detection methods at sampling locations. The modelling approach presented here makes efficient use of detections from multiple methods to estimate occupancy probabilities at two spatial scales and to compare detection probabilities associated with different detection methods. The models can be viewed as another variation of Pollock's robust design and may be applicable to a wide variety of scenarios where species occur in an area but are not always near the sampled locations. The estimation approach is likely to be especially useful in multispecies conservation programmes by providing efficient estimates using multiple detection devices and by providing device-specific detection probability estimates for use in survey design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., et al. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:teotwa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 8,488
Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals
White, G. C., & Burnham, K. P. (1999) · Bird Study · doi:10.1080/00063659909477239 · Cited by 7,499
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Andrew Royle, J., & Langtimm, C. A. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:esorwd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,481
Self-citationOccupancy Estimation and Modeling. Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence
Yoccoz, N. G. (2006) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[450:oeamip]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,300
Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence
MacKenzie, D. I. (2005) · Cited by 1,878
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Hines, J. E., Knutson, M. G., & Franklin, A. B. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-3090 · Cited by 1,741
Self-citationModel Selection: An Integral Part of Inference
Buckland, S. T., Burnham, K. P., & Augustin, N. H. (1997) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533961 · Cited by 1,717
Salamanders of the United States and Canada
Scott, D. E., & Petranka, J. W. (1999) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1447629 · Cited by 1,468
Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time
Yoccoz, N. G., Nichols, J. D., & Boulinier, T. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02205-4 · Cited by 1,432
Self-citation
Cited by
Guillera‐Arroita, G. (2017) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.02445 · Cited by 426
Detecting range shifts from historical species occurrences: new perspectives on old data
Tingley, M. W., & Beissinger, S. R. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.009 · Cited by 414
Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications
Shonfield, J., & Bayne, E. M. (2017) · Avian Conservation and Ecology · doi:10.5751/ace-00974-120114 · Cited by 366
Occupancy estimation and the closure assumption
Rota, C. T., Fletcher Jr, R. J., Dorazio, R. M., & Betts, M. G. (2009) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01734.x · Cited by 306
The recent past and promising future for data integration methods to estimate species’ distributions
Miller, D. A. W., Pacifici, K., Sanderlin, J. S., & Reich, B. J. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13110 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Nichols, J. D., Bailey, L. L., O’Connell Jr., A. F., Talancy, N. W., Campbell Grant, E. H., Gilbert, A. T., Annand, E. M., Husband, T. P., & Hines, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-29
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1321-1329
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2079715126
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi‐scale occupancy estimation and modelling using multiple detection methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01509.x
- The paper
- Nichols, J. D., Bailey, L. L., O’Connell Jr., A. F., Talancy, N. W., Campbell Grant, E. H., Gilbert, A. T., Annand, E. M., Husband, T. P., & Hines, J. E. (2008). Multi‐scale occupancy estimation and modelling using multiple detection methods. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01509.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.